The conflict between the will to deny horrible events and the will to proclaim them aloud is the central dialectic of psychological trauma.
Judith Lewis HermanRead
The legal system is designed to protect men from the superior power of the state but not to protect women or children from the superior power of men. It therefore provides strong guarantees for the rights of the accused but essentially no guarantees for the rights of the victim. If one set out by design to devise a system for provoking intrusive post-traumatic symptoms, one could not do better than a court of law.
Interpretation
The legal system often fails to protect marginalized groups from male dominance and can exacerbate trauma for victims.
Judith Lewis Herman critiques the legal system, arguing that while it is structured to safeguard individuals against state power, it inadequately defends women and children from male violence. The system's focus on the rights of the accused often comes at the expense of victims, creating an environment that can worsen their trauma rather than provide justice or healing.
In practice
During a discussion on gender-based violence and legal protections at a conference.
The conflict between the will to deny horrible events and the will to proclaim them aloud is the central dialectic of psychological trauma.
Over time as most people fail the survivor's exacting test of trustworthiness, she tends to withdraw from relationships. The isolation of the survivor thus persists even after she is free.
... in practice the standard for what constitutes rape is set not at the level of women's experience of violation but just above the level of coercion acceptable to men.
Justice prevails over transgression when she comes to the end of the race.
Justice has taken its course and the authority and legitimacy of the legal process must be respected.
Those who consent to the act and those who do it shall be equally punished.
A jury too often has at least one member more ready to hang the panel than to hang the traitor.
To exclude all jurors who would be in the slightest way effected by the prospect of the death penalty would be to deprive the defendant of the impartial jury to which he or she is entitled under the law.
Justice delayed is democracy denied.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.