Writing is a way of talking without being interrupted.
Literature is an occupation in which you have to keep proving your talent to people who have none
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote highlights the challenge writers face in gaining recognition and appreciation from an audience that may not understand their craft.
Jules Renard's quote encapsulates the struggles of literary artists who must continuously validate their skills in front of critics or audiences that may lack the necessary appreciation or talent themselves. It suggests the often unrecognized effort and perseverance required to succeed in the literary world, where the opinions of those who do not create can weigh heavily on the confidence of the creators.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a speech at a writing conference, one might quote this to inspire fellow authors about the persistence needed in their craft.
More from Jules Renard
All quotes βIf one were to build the house of happiness, the largest space would be the waiting room.
When I think of all the books still left for me to read, I am certain of further happiness.
It doesn't pay to say too much when you are mad enough to choke. For the word that stings the deepest is the word that is never spoke, Let the other fellow wrangle till the storm has blown away, then he'll do a heap of thinking about the things you didn't say.
I have no religion,β says Borneau, βbut I respect the religion of others. Religion is sacred.β Why this privilege, this immunity?... A believer creates God in his own image; if he is ugly, his God will be morally ugly. Why should moral ugliness be respectable?
If I had my life to live over again, I would ask that not a thing be changed, but that my eyes be opened wider.
Similar quotes
Short fiction and the novel, nonfiction and fiction, electronic texts and books - these are not opposites. One need not destroy the other to survive.
It is with noble sentiments that bad literature gets written.
It is a pity, in my opinion, that no prize exists for the writer who best refrains from adding to the world's bad books.
'No Sweetness Here' is the kind of old-fashioned social realism I have always been drawn to in fiction, and it does what I think all good literature should: It entertains you.
I emphasize the distinction between brackets and no brackets because it will affect your reading experience, if you will allow it. Brackets are exciting. Even though you are approaching Sappho in translation, that is no reason you should miss the drama of trying to read a papyrus torn in half or riddled with holes or smaller than a postage stamp--brackets imply a free space of imaginal adventure.
Most contemporary novels are not really "written." They obtain what reality they have largely from an accurate rendering of the noises that human beings currently make in their daily simple needs of communication; and what part of a novel is not composed of these noises consists of a prose which is no more alive than that of a competent newspaper writer or government official. A prose that is altogether alive demands something of the reader that the ordinary novel-reader is not prepared to give.