You can't quantify human pain the way you can measure out sugar. Death comes one individual at a time.
Yann MartelRead
If literature does one thing, it makes you more empathetic by making you live other lives and feel the pain of others. Ideologues don't feel the pain of others because they haven't imaginatively got under their skins.
Interpretation
Literature enhances empathy by enabling readers to experience other people's emotions and struggles.
This quote emphasizes the power of literature to cultivate empathy in readers. By immersing themselves in the stories of different characters, individuals can connect with the pain and joy of others, fostering a deeper understanding of human experiences. In contrast, ideologues, who adhere strictly to their beliefs, often lack this empathetic insight because they do not engage with perspectives outside their own, thus failing to perceive the emotional realities of others.
In practice
During a book club discussion on empathy and character development.
You can't quantify human pain the way you can measure out sugar. Death comes one individual at a time.
Come aboard if your destination is oblivion- it should be our next stop. We can sit together. You can have the window seat if you want. But it's a sad view.
Fiction and nonfiction are not so easily divided. Fiction may not be real, but it's true; it goes beyond the garland of facts to get to emotional and psychological truths.
The moon was a sharply defined crescent and the sky was perfectly clear. The stars shone with such fierce, contained brilliance that it seemed absurd to call the night dark.
I thought they were helping me. I was so full of trust in them that I felt grateful as they carried me in the air. Only when they threw me overboard did I begin to have doubts.
Art is a gift: you create and then you give away. How readers receive that gift is their business. If they hate it, that’s their response to it. Others respond by liking it. Either way, that is their interaction with the book, which is no longer mine.
The quietness of his tone italicized the malice of his reply.
Reduced... to a crude formula, the Russian tragedy is precisely the tragedy of a society in which literature turned out to be the prerogative of the minority.
I have never known a novel that was good enough to be good in spite of its being adapted to the author's political views.
In novels, and American novels in particular, it's not just about redemption, it's about forward movement and healing oneself. Americans are very big on getting better.
Walter Scott has no business to write novels, especially good ones. It is not fair. He has fame and profit enough as a poet, and should not be taking the bread out of the mouths of other people.
My theory is that literature is essential to society in the way that dreams are essential to our lives. We can't live without dreaming - as we can't live without sleep. We are 'conscious' beings for only a limited period of time, then we sink back into sleep - the 'unconscious.' It is nourishing, in ways we can't fully understand.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.