Communism is inequality, but not as property is. Property is exploitation of the weak by the strong. Communism is exploitation of the strong by the weak.
As man seeks justice in equality, so society seeks order in anarchy.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote suggests that the pursuit of justice and equality is a fundamental aspect of human nature, while society yearns for structure and stability amidst chaos.
Proudhon's quote illustrates the dual quest of humanity for justice and equality on an individual level, alongside the overarching desire of society to achieve order and coherence in the face of potential disorder, such as anarchy. It emphasizes the tension between personal aspirations for fairness and the collective need for social stability, suggesting that both are essential components of a functioning society.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a debate about social justice reforms, this quote can emphasize the need for balance in addressing individual rights and societal stability.
More from Pierre-Joseph Proudhon
All quotes βI build no system. I ask an end to privilege, the abolition of slavery, equality of rights, and the reign of law. Justice, nothing else; that is the alpha and omega of my argument: to others I leave the business of governing the world.
All men in their hearts, I say, bear witness to these truths; they need only to be made to understand it.
A common danger tends to concord. Communism is the exploitation of the strong by the weak. In Communism, inequality comes from placing mediocrity on a level with excellence.
To name a thing is easy: the difficulty is to discern it before its appearance.
The possessions of the rich are stolen property.
Similar quotes
God is very merciful to those whom He sees struggling heart and soul for spiritual realization. But remain idle, without any struggle, and you will see that His grace will never come.
My real self wanders elsewhere, far away, wanders on and on invisibly and has nothing to do with my life.
Among those who share a throne there can be no loyalty; Dominion's ever impatient consort.
Indeed, theological discourse offers its strange jubilation only to the strict extent that it permits and, dangerously, demands of it wokman that he speak beyond his means, precisely because he does not speak of himself. Hence the danger of a speech that, in a sense, speaks against the one who lends himself to it. One must obtain forgiveness for every essay in theology. In all senses.
In front of the photograph of my mother as a child, I tell myself: she is going to die: I shudder, like winnicott's psychotic patient, over a catastrophe which has already occurred. Whether or not the subject is already dead, every photograph is this catastrophe.
The past is only an unreliable memory held in the present. The future is only a projection of our present conceptions. The present itself vanishes as soon as we try to grasp it. So why bother with attempting to establish an illusion of solid ground?