I don't expect that the million will ever be won, simply because there is no confirming evidence for any paranormal claims to date.
Interpretation
James Randi expresses skepticism toward paranormal claims due to a lack of evidence, implying that belief should be grounded in verifiable facts.
In this quote, James Randi, a renowned skeptic, emphasizes the importance of evidence in evaluating paranormal claims. He argues that without concrete proof, the chances of winning a million-dollar challenge he offered for any demonstrable paranormal ability are slim, highlighting the necessity of skepticism in the pursuit of truth.
In practice
In a discussion about UFOs, you might say, 'I don't expect that the million will ever be won, simply because there is no confirming evidence for any paranormal claims to date.'
Science is best defined as a careful, disciplined, logical search for knowledge about any and all aspects of the universe, obtained by examination of the best available evidence and always subject to correction and improvement upon discovery of better evidence. What's left is magic. And it doesn't work.
[Psychics] use exactly the same gimmicks that we magicians do - the same physical methods, the same psychological methods - and they effectively and profoundly deceive millions of people around the earth, to their detriment.
Escapology has one thing going for it that probably made Harry Houdini such a superstar in his day and a legend in the present. Everyone wants to escape from something. Taxes, contracts, illness, work, the multitude of burdens that we chafe under are shadows from which we want to escape.
There is a distinct difference between having an open mind and having a hole in your head from which your brain leaks out.
My interest in science started quite early. My earliest school recollection, from age 6, is actually of mathematics, realizing that one could fill an entire page with digits and never come to the largest possible number, so I saw what was meant by infinity.
As a true scientist, I have been proved wrong so many times that I'm very humble.
The brain is the most complicated organ in the universe. We have learned a lot about other human organs. We know how the heart pumps and how the kidney does what it does. To a certain degree, we have read the letters of the human genome. But the brain has 100 billion neurons. Each one of those has about 10,000 connections.
Without deductive logic science would be entirely useless. It is merely a barren game to ascend from the particular to the general, unless afterwards we can reverse the process and descend from the general to the particular, ascending and descending like angels on Jacob's ladder.
It is mistaken to claim that global problems will be solved more quickly if only researchers would abandon their quest to understand the universe and knuckle down to work on an agenda of public or political concerns. These are not 'either/or' options - indeed, there is a positive symbiosis between them.
Adding CO2 to the air is like throwing another blanket on the bed.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.