We are confronted by the appearance of social institutions unintentionally created, vital for the welfare of society, which are not the result of reasoned planning
Carl MengerRead
Money is not an invention of the state. It is not the product of a legislative act.
Interpretation
Money is a natural development rather than a creation of government.
Carl Menger emphasizes that money did not originate from governmental legislation but rather evolved organically through social interactions and the needs of people. This underscores the idea that money serves as a medium of exchange that emerges from the market rather than being imposed from above by the state, highlighting its foundational role in facilitating trade and economies.
In practice
In an economics class, when discussing the origins of money, one might cite this quote to illustrate the difference between market-driven and state-driven concepts.
We are confronted by the appearance of social institutions unintentionally created, vital for the welfare of society, which are not the result of reasoned planning
Perhaps the hardest challenge has been to persuade the public, impatient for rapid growth, of the need to ensure stability first. Growth, it is argued, is always more important, regardless of the looming economic risks.
We contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle.
No country, however rich, can afford the waste of its human resources. Demoralization caused by vast unemployment is our greatest extravagance. Morally, it is the greatest menace to our social order.
It turns out that advancing equal opportunity and economic empowerment is both morally right and good economics. Why? Because discrimination, poverty and ignorance restrict growth. We know that investments in education, infrastructure and scientific and technological research increase growth. They increase good jobs, and they create new wealth for all of us.
Prosperous farmers mean more employment, more prosperity for the workers and the business men of every industrial area in the whole country.
I agree that income disparity is the great issue of our time. It is even broader and more difficult than the civil rights issues of the 1960s. The '99 percent' is not just a slogan. The disparity in income has left the middle class with lowered, not rising, income, and the poor unable to reach the middle class.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.