Mainstream cinema raises questions only to immediately provide an answer to them, so they can send the spectator home reassured. If we actually had those answers, then society would appear very different from what it is.
Michael HanekeRead
All movies assault the viewer in one way or another.
Interpretation
This quote suggests that movies evoke strong reactions from viewers, whether positive or negative.
Michael Haneke's quote highlights the impactful nature of cinema, implying that films are designed to provoke an emotional response from audiences. Whether through thrilling narratives, dramatic visuals, or unsettling themes, movies tend to influence the viewer's feelings and thoughts, acting as a form of assault that can be both challenging and enlightening.
In practice
During a film discussion, one might use this quote to emphasize the emotional impact of cinema.
Mainstream cinema raises questions only to immediately provide an answer to them, so they can send the spectator home reassured. If we actually had those answers, then society would appear very different from what it is.
An artist is someone who should raise questions rather than give answers. I have no message.
It's the duty of art to ask questions, not to provide answers. And if you want a clearer answer, I'll have to pass.
At its best, film should be like a ski jump. It should give the viewer the option of taking flight, while the act of jumping is left up to him.
When I first envisioned 'Funny Games' in the mid-1990s, it was my intention to have an American audience watch the movie. It is a reaction to a certain American cinema, its violence, its naivety, the way American cinema toys with human beings. In many American films, violence is made consumable.
I make my films because I'm affected by a situation, by something that makes me want to reflect on it, that lends itself to an artistic reflection. I always aim to look directly at what I'm dealing with. I think it's a task of dramatic art to confront us with things that in the entertainment industry are usually swept under the rug.
Selling beauty is something I can understand. Even selling false beauty seems perfectly natural; it's a sign of progress.
If the communication is perfect, the words have life, and that is all there is to good writing, putting down on the paper words which dance and weep and make love and fight and kiss and perform miracles.
Pianists call me a composer, composers call me a pianist. The classicists think me a futurist, and the futurists call me a reactionary.
As a writer, I absorb stories, allow them to churn within my own head and heart - often for years - until I find a way of telling them that fits both my time and temperament.
Rather than a teaching tool, I think a novel is more of a witnessing entity. A witnessing entity? What is that? I just want the reader to step in and experience it as a story.
I am involved in the architecture of space.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.