The first mission to Mars did not expect to find craters and river valleys, and yet they did. The first mission to Jupiter didn't expect to find ocean worlds and volcano worlds, but they did.
When I started working with NASA in 1989 as part of a mission to send spacecraft to Pluto, I knew it would take at least 10-15 years to see results of my efforts.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote emphasizes the importance of patience and long-term vision in achieving significant scientific goals.
Alan Stern's quote reflects the reality of scientific exploration, particularly in ambitious projects such as sending spacecraft to distant destinations like Pluto. It highlights that groundbreaking work, especially in fields like space exploration, often requires a prolonged commitment and the understanding that meaningful results may take years or even decades to materialize, underscoring the need for perseverance and dedication in the pursuit of knowledge.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
This quote can be used in a motivational speech to encourage students pursuing careers in STEM fields.
More from Alan Stern
All quotes →I can't imagine how many kids around the world will look at pictures of Pluto and think, 'I want to grow up to be a scientist.'
If two billion people wanted to watch a robot fly by Pluto, imagine what it will be like when the first humans step on Mars. It'll be the most unifying event anybody could ever put on.
We're going to find Marses and maybe Earths out in the solar system's attic of the Oort Cloud and the Kuiper Belt.
Similar quotes
Science is composed of laws which were originally based on a small, carefully selected set of observations, often not very accurately measured originally; but the laws have later been found to apply over much wider ranges of observations and much more accurately than the original data justified.
The problem with intelligent-design theory, is not that it is false but that it is not falsifiable. Not being susceptible to contradicting evidence, it is not a testable hypothesis. Hence it is not a scientific but a creedal tenet - a matter of faith, unsuited to a public school's science curriculum.
Data is like garbage. You'd better know what you are going to do with it before you collect it.
Without deductive logic science would be entirely useless. It is merely a barren game to ascend from the particular to the general, unless afterwards we can reverse the process and descend from the general to the particular, ascending and descending like angels on Jacob's ladder.
Space is not empty. It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves. The universe is not separate from this cosmic sea of energy.
Science proceeds more by what it has learned to ignore than what it takes into account.