I think the rule should be that if we're going to take actions overseas that result in the deaths of people, the United States should take responsibility for that.
John O. BrennanRead
I do not - I never believed it's better to kill a terrorist than to detain him. We want to detain as many terrorists as possible so we can elicit the intelligence from them in the appropriate manner so that we can disrupt follow-on terrorist attacks.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Detaining terrorists is preferable to killing them for the sake of gathering intelligence and preventing further attacks.
This quote emphasizes the importance of capturing terrorists for intelligence purposes rather than resorting to lethal force. John O. Brennan argues that by detaining and interrogating terrorists, more valuable information can be gained to prevent future attacks, highlighting a strategic approach to counter-terrorism that prioritizes knowledge and information over immediate violence.
Themes
TerrorismIntelligenceDetentionPreventionSecurity
In practice
Example use cases
In a discussion about counter-terrorism strategies at a security conference.
More from John O. Brennan
All quotes →While the intelligence profession oftentimes demands secrecy, it is critically important that there be a full and open discourse on intelligence matters with the appropriate elected representatives of the American people.
John O. BrennanRead
As a former career intelligence professional, I have a profound appreciation for the value of intelligence. Intelligence disrupts terrorist plots and thwarts attacks. Intelligence saves lives.
John O. BrennanRead
We are in this business, whether it be intelligence or the government, to protect freedom, democracy and liberty, not to violate that.
John O. BrennanRead
Terrorists are not 100 feet tall. Nor do they deserve the abject fear they seek to instill.
John O. BrennanRead
When we uphold the rule of law, our counterterrorism tools are more likely to withstand the scrutiny of our courts, our allies, and the American people.
John O. BrennanRead
Similar quotes
It may be thought justifiable to require tests on animals of potentially life-saving drugs, but the same kinds of tests are used for products like cosmetics, food coloring, and floor polishes. Should thousands of animals suffer so that a new kind of lipstick or floor wax can be put on the market? Don't we already have an excess of most of these products? Who benefits from their introduction, except the companies that hope to profit from them?
Peter SingerRead
Humankind can't stand too much reality.
T. S. EliotRead
Physicians think they are doing something for you by labeling what you have as a disease
Immanuel KantRead
Majorities, as such, afford no guarantees for justice. They are men of the same nature as minorities. They have the same passions for fame, power, and money, as minorities; and are liable and likely to be equally - perhaps more than equally, because more boldly - rapacious, tyrannical and unprincipled, if intrusted with power.
Lysander SpoonerRead
We must remember that there is a great difference between a myth and a miracle. A myth is the idealization of a fact. A miracle is the counterfeit of a fact. There is the same difference between a myth and a miracle that there is between fiction and falsehood -- between poetry and perjury. Miracles belong to the far past and the far future. The little line of sand, called the present, between the seas, belongs to common sense to the natural.
Robert Green IngersollRead
Fortune, not wisdom, rules lives.
Marcus Tullius CiceroRead