I think the rule should be that if we're going to take actions overseas that result in the deaths of people, the United States should take responsibility for that.
Interpretation
The U.S. should be accountable for its military actions abroad that lead to loss of life.
This quote emphasizes the moral responsibility of the United States in its foreign military operations, arguing that there is an ethical obligation to acknowledge and take accountability for the consequences, particularly the loss of lives that result from such actions. It calls for a reflective consideration of the heavy impact of international interventions and stresses the importance of transparency and accountability in leadership.
In practice
During a discussion on the ethics of military intervention, one might use this quote to highlight the need for accountability.
I do not - I never believed it's better to kill a terrorist than to detain him. We want to detain as many terrorists as possible so we can elicit the intelligence from them in the appropriate manner so that we can disrupt follow-on terrorist attacks.
While the intelligence profession oftentimes demands secrecy, it is critically important that there be a full and open discourse on intelligence matters with the appropriate elected representatives of the American people.
As a former career intelligence professional, I have a profound appreciation for the value of intelligence. Intelligence disrupts terrorist plots and thwarts attacks. Intelligence saves lives.
We are in this business, whether it be intelligence or the government, to protect freedom, democracy and liberty, not to violate that.
Terrorists are not 100 feet tall. Nor do they deserve the abject fear they seek to instill.
When we uphold the rule of law, our counterterrorism tools are more likely to withstand the scrutiny of our courts, our allies, and the American people.
If we want girls to receive positive reinforcement for early acts of leadership, let's discourage bossy behavior along with banning bossy labels. That means teaching girls to engage in behaviors that earn admiration before they assert their authority.
My own experience is use the tools that are out there. Use the digital world. But never lose sight of the need to reach out and talk to other people who don't share your view. Listen to them and see if you can find a way to compromise.
We are workers, not master builders, ministers, not messiahs. We are prophets of a future not our own.
When you delegate tasks, you create followers. When you delegate authority, you create leaders.
I have a very modern way of thinking; the chef is there to lead the team and not just to sit behind the piano.
I worry that there are people who are put in positions of authority because they're good talkers, but they don't have good ideas. It's so easy to confuse schmoozing ability with talent. Someone seems like a good presenter, easy to get along with, and those traits are rewarded. Well, why is that? They're valuable traits, but we put too much of a premium on presenting and not enough on substance and critical thinking.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.