It's not enough to tackle just the symptoms of poverty. You have to tackle the causes of poverty.
George OsborneRead
Just as we should never balance the budget on the backs of the poor, so it is an economic delusion to think you can balance it only on the wallets of the rich.
Interpretation
Economic policies should be fair to both the poor and the rich, as reliance on one group will lead to imbalance and delusion.
George Osborne highlights the importance of a balanced economic approach that does not unfairly burden the poor while simultaneously relying solely on the wealthy for funding. True economic stability requires contributions and considerations from all segments of society to ensure fairness and sustainability.
In practice
During a debate about tax reforms, this quote can emphasize the need for equitable policies that consider all socioeconomic classes.
It's not enough to tackle just the symptoms of poverty. You have to tackle the causes of poverty.
Four things have almost invariably followed the imposition of controls to keep prices below the level they would reach under supply and demand in a free market: (1) increased use of the product or service whose price is controlled, (2) Reduced supply of the same product or service, (3) quality deterioration, (4) black markets.
We have designed a capitalist system wrong. We assume human beings are one-dimensional, all they do is make money, so we've created a money-centric world.
Really, the proper study of economics is fulfilment, not consumption... It doesn't even matter if it's a green product or a green house... It's still consumption. What matters in this world is the fulfilment of people's needs and the fulfilment of their aspirations.
Political economy came into being as a natural result of the expansion of trade, and with its appearance elementary, unscientific huckstering was replaced by a developed system of licensed fraud, an entire science of enrichment.
Why do we fully tax some kinds of income from capital, like interest and dividends; partially tax other kinds like capital gains; defer tax on other kinds, like IRAs; and impose no tax at all on still other types of capital income, like interest on municipal bonds? This simply is not rational. These distinctions don't have any inherent logic.
Most high-income people in our country do not realize that their incomes are being subsidized by their protection from competition from highly skilled people who are prevented from immigrating to the United States. But we need such skills in order to staff our productive economy, so that the standard of living for Americans as a whole can grow.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.