We live in the best of all possible worlds
Gottfried LeibnizRead
According to their [Newton and his followers] doctrine, God Almighty wants to wind up his watch from time to time: otherwise it would cease to move. He had not, it seems, sufficient foresight to make it a perpetual motion. Nay, the machine of God's making, so imperfect, according to these gentlemen; that he is obliged to clean it now and then by an extraordinary concourse, and even to mend it, as clockmaker mends his work.
Interpretation
This quote critiques the view that God must intervene in creation to keep it functioning, contrasting it with the idea of a perfect, self-sustaining universe.
Gottfried Leibniz critiques the notion held by Newton and some of his followers that God needs to continually intervene in the mechanics of the universe, akin to a clockmaker winding a watch. He suggests that if God had truly created a perfect universe, such intervention would be unnecessary, implying that a truly divine creation would operate autonomously without frequent repairs or adjustments.
In practice
In a debate about the nature of divine intervention during a philosophy seminar.
We live in the best of all possible worlds
I am so in favor of the actual infinite that instead of admitting that Nature abhors it, as is commonly said, I hold that Nature makes frequent use of it everywhere, in order to show more effectively the perfections of its Author.
It is unworthy of excellent men to lose hours like slaves in the labor of calculation which could be relegated to anyone else if machines were used.
..This is why the ultimate reason of things must lie in a necessary substance, in which the differentiation of the changes only exists eminently as in their source; and this is what we call God.
...a distinction must be made between true and false ideas, and that too much rein must not be given to a man's imagination under pretext of its being a clear and distinct intellection.
These principles have given me a way of explaining naturally the union or rather the mutual agreement [conformité] of the soul and the organic body. The soul follows its own laws, and the body likewise follows its own laws; and they agree with each other in virtue of the pre-established harmony between all substances, since they are all representations of one and the same universe.
It seems the more I think about not sinning, the more I sin, but the more I think about just loving Jesus, the less I seem to sin. Falling in love seems to be the key.
But the problem is to make the soul into a monster
Genteel women suppose that those things do not really exist about which it is impossible to talk in polite company.
The other gods were strong; but thou wast weak; they rode, but thou didst stumble to a throne; But to our wounds only God's wounds can speak, And not a god has wounds, but thou alone.
It's not speech per se that allows democracies to function, but the ability to agree - eventually, at least some of the time - on what is true, what is important and what serves the public good. This doesn't mean everyone must agree on every fact, or that our priorities are necessarily uniform.
But the child's sob curses deeper in the silence than the strong man in his wrath!
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.