In a constitutional democracy the moral content of law must be given by the morality of the framer or legislator, never by the morality of the judge.
The notion that Congress can change the meaning given a constitutional provision by the Court is subversive of the function of judicial review; and it is not the less so because the Court promises to allow it only when the Constitution is moved to the left.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote critiques the idea that Congress can alter the judicial interpretation of the Constitution, suggesting this undermines judicial review.
Robert Bork's quote addresses the tension between legislative power and judicial interpretation within the context of the U.S. Constitution. He argues that if Congress has the ability to redefine constitutional provisions as interpreted by the Court, it threatens the very principle of judicial review. Bork expresses concern over the potential manipulation of constitutional meanings, particularly when such interpretations are aligned with a shift in progressive political ideology, highlighting the necessity for an independent judiciary to uphold constitutional integrity.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
This quote can be used in a political debate to emphasize the importance of judicial independence.
More from Robert Bork
All quotes →A society deadened by a smothering network of laws while finding release in moral chaos is not likely to be either happy or stable.
When a judge assumes the power to decide which distinctions made in a statute are legitimate and which are not, he assumes the power to disapprove of any and all legislation, because all legislation makes distinctions
Similar quotes
This is sweet to see your foe, perish and pay to justice all he owes.
One always has the idea of a stupid man as perfectly healthy and ordinary, and of illness as making one refined and clever and unusual.
Neither the sun nor death can be looked at steadily.
Many introverts feel there's something wrong with them, and try to pass as extroverts. But whenever you try to pass as something you're not, you lose a part of yourself along the way. You especially lose a sense of how to spend your time.
Curtailment of free speech is rationalized on grounds that a more compelling American tradition forbids criticism of the government when the nation is at war... Nothing can be more destructive of our fundamental democratic traditions than the vicious effort to silence dissenters.
One feels as if it could never, never be less. And yet all griefs, when there is no bitterness in them, are soothed down by time.