The historical profession is nowhere famous for its tolerance, but there are not many countries where historians can expect to pay for their opinions with penal servitude or the firing squad.
Norman DaviesRead
Nowadays, it is no longer possible to maintain that the Nazi-Soviet pact of 23 August 1939 was a fiction invented by bourgeois-imperialist enemies. Everyone has seen the film clips of Herr Ribbentrop landing in Moscow, and of Stalin smiling broadly as Ribbentrop and Molotov signed up side by side.
Interpretation
The quote emphasizes the historical reality of the Nazi-Soviet pact and dispels myths surrounding it.
Norman Davies highlights the undeniable evidence of the Nazi-Soviet pact, which was established in 1939 and reveals a critical moment in history where two ideologically opposed regimes came together. By referencing the film clips of key figures involved in the signing, he underscores the importance of recognizing this pact as a real event rather than a fictitious narrative created by those who oppose both regimes.
In practice
In a history class discussing World War II, this quote can highlight the significance of the Nazi-Soviet pact.
The historical profession is nowhere famous for its tolerance, but there are not many countries where historians can expect to pay for their opinions with penal servitude or the firing squad.
Transience is one of the fundamental characteristics both of the human condition and of the political order.
Why are some things remembered and others forgotten? That is the theme I want to pursue about the Second World War.
Our mental maps are distorted by who are the 'winners' of history and who are the powers of today.
One might have thought that 70 years was time enough to work out what really happened in 1939. It isn't the case. Misunderstandings and misinformation abound.
I wanted to produce a book that would demonstrate not only the rich diversity of people who answered to Anders's command but also the extraordinary variety of their experiences and emotions: from death to despair, fear and longings and eventually to hope.
For one thing, before the 20th century, there were plenty of genocides. We tend to forget about them, partly because they weren't as well documented and partly because, until recently, people didn't care. We used euphemisms like 'sackings' and 'sieges' instead of calling them 'genocides.'
During World War II, law-abiding Japanese-American citizens were herded into remote internment camps, losing their jobs, businesses and social standing, while an all-Japanese-American division fought heroically in Europe.
There are a whole lot of historical factors that have played a part in our being where we are today, and I think that to even to begin to understand our contemporary issues and contemporary problems, you have to understand a little bit about that history.
It is, I believe, the greatest generation any society has ever produced.
The world must know what happened, and never forget.
All historical writing, even the most honest, is unconsciously subjective, since every age is bound, in spite of itself, to make the dead perform whatever tricks it finds necessary for its own peace of mind.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.