When your outgo exceeds your income, the upshot may be your downfall.
Paul HarveyRead
One vote. That's a big weapon you have there, Mister. In 1948, just one additional vote in each precinct would have elected Dewey. In 1960, one vote in each precinct in Illinois would have elected Nixon. One vote.
Interpretation
Each individual's vote holds significant power in determining the outcome of elections.
This quote by Paul Harvey emphasizes the weight that a single vote can carry in electoral processes. It highlights historical instances where close elections could have had different outcomes with just one more vote, thereby reinforcing the importance of civic participation and personal agency in shaping democracy.
In practice
In a discussion on why voting is important, this quote can be used to emphasize individual responsibility.
When your outgo exceeds your income, the upshot may be your downfall.
We've drifted away from being fishers of men to being keepers of the aquarium.
In times like these, it helps to recall that there have always been times like these.
I've never seen a monument erected to a pessimist.
Oh, things always get better. Tomorrow will always be better. Just think about it . . . is there any time in history in which you'd rather live than now?
We were poor, but we didn't know it. There were no government bureaus in those days presuming to determine where poorness begins and ends, but I don't remember ever being hungry.
It is an axiom of political life that you never raise expectations, whether in a political or military campaign, because your defeats are then magnified and your victories discounted.
If the people fail to vote, a government will be developed which is not their government... The whole system of American Government rests on the ballot box. Unless citizens perform their duties there, such a system of government is doomed to failure.
I think that America's recovery of a global strategic view is an absolutely essential element of our foreign policy.
If one generation is expected to carry an excessive burden on behalf of another, it will seek by every means to avoid it. It will either demand that past promises are broken, or it will not work, or it will not pay taxes, or the most talented people will leave. Socialist governments which have tried to tax 'till the pips squeak' have ample experience of that.
First of all, the world criticizes American foreign policy because Americans criticize American foreign policy. We shouldn't be surprised about that. Criticizing government is a God-given right - at least in democracies.
They are longing for a war with Iran. Iran is no more a harm to us than was Iraq or Afghanistan. They invented an enemy, they tell lies, lies, lies. The New York Times goes along with their lies, lies, lies. And they don't stop. When the public that's lied to 30 times a day it's apt to believe the lies, is not it?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.