In order to shake a hypothesis, it is sometimes not necessary to do anything more than push it as far as it will go.
Interpretation
Challenging a hypothesis often requires pushing its boundaries to test its validity.
Denis Diderot's quote emphasizes the importance of rigor in scientific inquiry. Sometimes, simply exploring the limits of a hypothesis can reveal its strengths or weaknesses, encouraging deeper understanding and potential revision of ideas. This approach fosters critical thinking and innovation in the pursuit of knowledge.
In practice
In a science class discussion about experimental methods, this quote can be used to illustrate the importance of rigorous testing of theories.
The arbitrary rule of a just and enlightened prince is always bad. His virtues are the most dangerous and the surest form of seduction: they lull a people imperceptibly into the habit of loving, respecting, and serving his successor, whoever that successor may be, no matter how wicked or stupid.
This root [the potato], no matter how much you prepare it, is tasteless and floury. It cannot pass for an agreeable food, but it supplies a food sufficiently abundant and sufficiently healthy for men who ask only to sustain themselves. The potato is criticized with reason for being windy, but what matters windiness for the vigorous organisms of peasants and laborers?
Do you see this egg? With this you can topple every theological theory, every church or temple in the world.
There are three principal means of acquiring knowledge... observation of nature, reflection, and experimentation. Observation collects facts; reflection combines them; experimentation verifies the result of that combination.
In order to get as much fame as one's father one has to much more able than he.
All abstract sciences are nothing but the study of relations between signs.
Bertrand Russell had given a talk on the then new quantum mechanics, of whose wonders he was most appreciative. He spoke hard and earnestly in the New Lecture Hall. And when he was done, Professor Whitehead, who presided, thanked him for his efforts, and not least for 'leaving the vast darkness of the subject unobscured'.
I just felt that space was the next thing coming in aviation. It was higher, faster. It had the risk.
As in biomedical science, pioneering industrial inventions have not been mothered by necessity. Rather, inventions for which there was no commercial use only later became the commercial airplanes, xerography and lasers on which modern society depends.
No machines will ever truly fully figure the brain out, because the brain's performance is constantly altered or else constrained by this inanimate, rogue artifact you can't control, namely, speech.
I am on the edge of mysteries and the veil is getting thinner and thinner.
The nuclear industry has this amazing record, even equipment from generations one and two. But nuclear mishaps tend to come in these big events - Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, and now Fukushima - so it's more visible.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.