If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.
Interpretation
The quote expresses a deep sense of wonder and admiration for the natural world as understood through science.
In this quote, Albert Einstein reflects on a profound sense of spirituality derived from the awe-inspiring complexity and beauty of the universe as revealed by scientific inquiry. He suggests that his appreciation for the natural world's structure and laws can be deemed a form of religiosity, highlighting a connection between scientific understanding and a deep emotional response to existence.
In practice
This quote can be used during a talk about the relationship between science and spirituality.
I cannot then believe in this concept of an anthropomorphic God who has the powers of interfering with these natural laws. As I said before, the most beautiful and most profound religious emotion that we can experience is the sensation of the mystical. And this mysticality is the power of all true science.
If I would follow your advice and Jesus could perceive it, he, as a Jewish teacher, surely would not approve of such behavior.
I want to know all Gods thoughts; all the rest are just details.
In the middle of adversity there is great opportunity.
I do not believe that civilization will be wiped out in a war fought with the atomic bomb. Perhaps two-thirds of the people of the earth will be killed.
To me the worst thing seems to be a school principally to work with methods of fear, force and artificial authority. Such treatment destroys the sound sentiments, the sincerity and the self-confidence of pupils and produces a subservient subject.
When an economist says the evidence is "mixed," he or she means that theory says one thing and data says the opposite.
Science, we are repeatedly told, is the most reliable form of knowledge about the world because it is based on testable hypotheses. Religion, by contrast, is based on faith. The term 'doubting Thomas' well illustrates the difference.
Anybody who has been seriously engaged in scientific work of any kind realizes that over the entrance to the gates of the temple of science are written the words: 'Ye must have faith.'
The facts will eventually test all our theories, and they form, after all, the only impartial jury to which we can appeal.
... many folks take them seriously because they just 'know' that evolution can never be seen in the immediate here and now. In fact, a precisely opposite situation prevails: biologists have documented a veritable glut of cases for rapid and eminently measurable evolution on timescales of years and decades.
The scientist is not responsible for the laws of nature. It is his job to find out how these laws operate. It is the scientist's job to find the ways in which these laws can serve the human will. However, it is not the scientist's job to determine whether a hydrogen bomb should be constructed, whether it should be used, or how it should be used. This responsibility rests with the American people and with their chosen representatives.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.