I refuse to accept that the world is so poor, when just one week of global spending on armies is enough to bring all of our children into classrooms.
Kailash SatyarthiRead
For me, peace is a fundamental human right of every child; it is inevitable and divine.
Interpretation
Peace is a basic right that every child deserves, viewed as both essential and sacred.
Kailash Satyarthi emphasizes that peace is not just a desirable state, but a fundamental right inherent to every child. He presents the idea that ensuring peace is both a necessary duty of society and a divine principle, highlighting the sanctity of childhood and the universal need for a peaceful environment for children to thrive.
In practice
In a speech advocating for children's rights at a conference, I might say, 'As Kailash Satyarthi reminds us, peace is a fundamental human right of every child.'
I refuse to accept that the world is so poor, when just one week of global spending on armies is enough to bring all of our children into classrooms.
We adults, our policies, our ways of governance, are responsible for poverty, not the children.
Child labor perpetuates poverty, unemployment, illiteracy, population growth and other social problems.
The single aim of my life is that every child is:_x000D_ free to be a child,_x000D_ free to grow and develop,_x000D_ free to eat, sleep, see daylight,_x000D_ free to laugh and cry,_x000D_ free to play,_x000D_ free to learn, free to go to school, and above all, free to dream.
I dream for a world which is free of child labour, a world in which every child goes to school. A world in which every child gets his rights.
World's children cannot wait any longer. While international community debates and issues recommendations, statements and fine speeches, world's children - marginalised, socially excluded, poor and vulnerable - continue to suffer.
For the complete extinction of the state, complete Communism is necessary.
A small grove massacred to the last ash, _x000D_ _x000D_ An oak with heart-rot, give away the show: _x000D_ _x000D_ This great society is going to smash; _x000D_ _x000D_ They cannot fool us with how fast they go, _x000D_ _x000D_ How much they cost each other and the gods. _x000D_ _x000D_ A culture is no better than its woods.
When you look at a corporation, just like when you look at a slave owner, you want to distinguish between the institution and the individual. So slavery, for example, or other forms of tyranny, are inherently monstrous. The individuals participating in them may be the nicest guys you can imagine.
In a world full of danger, to be a potentially seeable object is to be constantly exposed to danger. Self-consciousness, then, may be the apprehensive awareness of oneself as potentially exposed to danger by the simple fact of being visible to others. The obvious defence against such a danger is to make oneself invisible in one way or another.
...the statement, "The purpose of the law is to cause justice to reign," is not a rigorously accurate statement. It ought to be stated that the purpose of the law is to prevent injustice from reigning. In fact, it is injustice, instead of justice, that has an existence of its own. Justice is achieved only when injustice is absent.
I am a creationist and an evolutionist. Evolution is God's, or Nature's method of creation. Creation is not an event that happened in 4004 BC; it is a process that began some 10 billion years ago and is still under way.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.