When you stop doing something, it doesn't mean you are rejecting the previous work. That's the mistake; it's not rejecting it, it's saying, 'I have exploited it enough now and I wish to take a look at another corner.'
Photographs aren't accounts of scrutiny. The shutter is open for a fraction of a second.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Photographs capture fleeting moments rather than complete truths.
David Hockney's quote emphasizes that photography is an art form that captures brief instances in time, rather than providing thorough examinations or comprehensive narratives. The mention of the shutter being open for only a fraction of a second highlights the ephemeral nature of the photographic medium, suggesting that while a photograph may depict reality, it cannot fully encompass the depth and complexity of an experience.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a photography workshop, to explain the nature of snapshots, you might say, 'As David Hockney once said, photographs capture fleeting moments, so let's focus on capturing the essence in our shots.'
More from David Hockney
All quotes βI'm interested in all kinds of pictures, however they are made, with cameras, with paint brushes, with computers, with anything.
I've always wanted to be able to paint the dawn.
My only worry is the painting I'm doing. Nothing else.
In fact, most artists want to make things a bit more difficult for themselves as they go along, to challenge themselves.
I can get excitement watching rain on a puddle. And then I paint it. Now, I admit, there are not too many people who would find that exciting. But I would. And I want life thrilling and rich. And it is. I make sure it is.
Similar quotes
I must say here in France I had more serenity or security as I was working because I knew I was making the film the way I wished and that the film would be seen, ultimately, which is not always the case in Iran. In Iran, you always work having in mind this worry of will I be able to carry on my project as I wish and will the audience see the film.
While an artist can choose whether or not to be responsive and responsible towards other human beings, by definition a designer must be.
Writers really live in the mind and in hotels of the soul.
I am no longer afraid of becoming lost, because the journey back always reveals something new, and that is ultimately good for the artist.
On the other hand, what I like my music to do to me is awaken the ghosts inside of me. Not the demons, you understand, but the ghosts.
What does one prefer? An art that struggles to change the social contract, but fails? Or one that seeks to please and amuse, and succeeds?