Like the collector, the photographer is animated by a passion that, even when it appears to be for the present, is linked to a sense of the past.
Susan SontagRead
Photographs are a way of imprisoning reality, understood as recalcitrant, inaccessible; of making it stand still. One can't possess reality, one can possess (and be possessed by) images β as, according to Proust, most ambitious of voluntary prisoners, one can't possess the present but one can possessthe past.
Interpretation
This quote reflects on the nature of photography as a means to capture and hold onto reality, which is otherwise fleeting and elusive.
Susan Sontag's quote explores the paradox of photography: while it allows us to capture moments and memories, it simultaneously indicates that we can never truly hold onto reality itself. Photography serves as a tool for preserving our perceptions of the world, but it highlights the limitations of those images in truly representing the present, as we can only ever refer back to what has already transpired, making us prisoners of our captured past.
In practice
In a presentation on the impact of photography on art appreciation.
Like the collector, the photographer is animated by a passion that, even when it appears to be for the present, is linked to a sense of the past.
Science fiction films are not about science. They are about disaster, which is one of the oldest subjects of art.
Gide and I have attained such perfect intellectual communion that I experience the appropriate labor pains for every thought he gives birth to!
Volume depends precisely on the writer's having been able to sit in a room every day, year after year, alone.
In NY sensuality completely turns into sexuality - no objects for the senses to respond to, no beautiful river, houses, people. Awful smells of the street, and dirt... Nothing except eating, if that, and the frenzy of the bed.
It hurts to love. It's like giving yourself to be flayed and knowing that at any moment the other person may just walk off with your skin.
All fiction is a process of imagining: whatever you write, in whatever genre or medium, your task is to make things up convincingly and interestingly and new.
When a documentary filmmaker, working in the style that I do, suggests that there has been a shooting ratio of 40 hours to every one hour of finished film, that doesn't mean that the other 39 are bad.
In any really good subject, one has only to probe deep enough to come to tears.
Ideas aren't real estate, they grow collectively and that knocks out the egotistical loneliness that generally infects art.
Weβre all children of Kubrick, arenβt we? Is there anything you can do that he hasnβt done?
We tend to think and feel in terms of the art we like; and if the art we like is bad then our thinking and feeling will be bad. And if the thinking and feeling of most of the individuals composing a society is bad, is not that society in danger?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.