Better guilt than the terrible burden of freedom and responsibility.
All power is in essence power to deny mortality.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote suggests that the quest for power often stems from a desire to overcome the inevitability of death.
Ernest Becker's quote reflects the idea that the pursuit of power is fundamentally linked to our struggle against mortality. In essence, he argues that individuals seek power not only for control over their lives and others but also as a means to confront and deny the reality of their own mortality, highlighting the existential fears that drive human behavior. This perspective invites a deeper contemplation on the motivations behind our ambitions and the lengths to which we go to achieve a sense of permanence in a transient world.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a motivational speech about overcoming fears, this quote can illustrate the drive behind human ambition.
More from Ernest Becker
All quotes βThe artist takes in the world, but instead of being oppressed by it, he reworks it in his own personality and recreates it in the work of art.
When you confuse personal love and cosmic heroism you are bound to fail in both spheres. The impossibility of the heroism undermines the love, even if it is real. This double failure is what produces the sense of utter despair that we see in modern man... Love, then, is seen a religious problem
If the love object is divine perfection, then one's own self is elevated by joining one's destiny to it... All our guilt, fear, and even our mortality itself can be purged in a perfect consummation with perfection itself.
Each society is a hero system which promises victory over evil and death.
We might say that psychoanalysis revealed to us the complex penalties of denying the truth of man's condition, what we might call the costs of pretending not to be mad.
Similar quotes
There is no reality of consciousness independent of the effects of various vehicles of content on subsequent action (and hence, of course, on memory).
People have been predicting the death of philosophy since the 17th century. When I was a student, people were saying, 'We're in the last days of philosophy.' Then we were told in the '60s it would be replaced by sociology, then by literary criticism.
I think philosophers can do things akin to theoretical scientists, in that, having read about empirical data, they too can think of what hypotheses and theories might account for that data. So there's a continuity between philosophy and science in that way.
I've always believed that we were, each of us, put here for a reason, that there is a plan, somehow a divine plan for all of us. I know now that whatever days are left to me belong to him.
Every society needs to examine itself in relation to other societies.
Iconic Paris tells us: here are our three-star attractions, go thou and marvel. And so we gaze obediently at what we are told to gaze at, without exactly asking why.