We are, quite literally, gambling with the future of our planet- for the sake of hamburgers
Interpretation
The quote emphasizes the detrimental impact of certain dietary choices on the planet's future.
Peter Singer's quote highlights the moral implications of our actions, particularly in relation to environmental sustainability. By comparing our dietary choices—specifically, meat consumption—to gambling, he suggests that we risk irreversible harm to the planet for the short-term pleasure of eating hamburgers. This reflects a broader ethical concern about how human behavior impacts the world and future generations.
In practice
In a discussion on climate change at a conference, one might quote Singer to highlight the effects of dietary choices on the environment.
The belief that the animals exist because God created them - and that he created them so we can better meet our needs - is contrary to our scientific understanding of evolution and, of course, to the fossil record, which shows the existence of non-human primates and other animals millions of years before there were any human beings at all.
Pain and suffering are in themselves bad and should be prevented or minimized, irrespective of the race, sex, or species of the being that suffers. How bad a pain is depends on how intense it is and how long it lasts, but pain of the same intensity and duration are equally bad, whether felt by humans or animals.
What is faith? If you believe something because you have evidence for it, or rational argument, that is not faith. So faith seems to be believing something despite the absence of evidence or rational argument for it.
Almost everybody accepts that some people can be killed. 'The concept of 'brain death' - the belief that people on respirators can legitimately be killed - shows that.
If we all think only of our own interests, we are headed for collective disaster - just look at what we are doing to our planet's climate.
Even in the era of AIDS, sex raises no unique moral issues at all. Decisions about sex may involve considerations about honesty, concern for others, prudence, and so on, but there is nothing special about sex in this respect, for the same could be said of decisions about driving a car. (In fact, the moral issues raised by driving a car, both from an environmental and from a safety point of view, are much more serious than those raised by sex.)
I am for freedom of religion, and against all maneuvers to bring about a legal ascendency of one sect over another.
Man's grandeur is that he knows himself to be miserable.
Of our relation to all creation we can never know anything whatsoever. All is immensity and chaos. But, since all this knowledge of our limitations cannot possibly be of any value to us, it is better to ignore it in our daily conduct of life.
What is essential, therefore, is not that you no longer believe, but that God continues to believe in you.
What a country needs to do is be fair to all its citizens - whether people are of a different ethnicity or gender.
It is a cheap zeal that reserves its passions to combat only the sins and temptations of others.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.