Clearly, the qualities Poles admire in a secretary of state - foreign languages, diplomatic experience, even sense of humor - are emphatically not those desired in a head of state: So be it.
Anne ApplebaumRead
Quite a lot has been written, including by me, about the effect of social media on politics, and in particular the way in which the algorithms built into Facebook and YouTube are more likely to spread angry, extremist and deliberately provocative political language.
Interpretation
Social media algorithms tend to amplify extreme and provocative political rhetoric.
In this quote, Anne Applebaum discusses the significant influence of social media platforms like Facebook and YouTube on political discourse. She highlights how the algorithms used by these platforms are designed to promote content that elicits strong emotional responses, particularly anger, which can lead to the proliferation of extremist views and divisive language in the political arena.
In practice
In a discussion about social media's role in modern politics.
Clearly, the qualities Poles admire in a secretary of state - foreign languages, diplomatic experience, even sense of humor - are emphatically not those desired in a head of state: So be it.
At times when people fear death, they go along with measures that they believe, rightly or wrongly, will save them - even if that means a loss of freedom. Such measures have been popular in the past.
Birtherism surely increased Americans' distrust of politics, though in ways that are hard to pin down. By contrast, when anti-vaxxers persuade parents not to vaccinate children, the result can be sickness and even death.
As a journalist, I know what it is like to incur the self-righteous wrath of people who denounce you for things you didn't say or didn't mean.
If we can't have a public debate because the information space is so polluted, or because people are afraid of the reactions of organized trolls, then we can't really have meaningful elections anymore, either.
Elections are always a Rorschach test - people look at the results and see what they want to see.
Since the rise of Homo sapiens, human beings have been the smartest minds around. But very shortly - on a historical scale, that is - we can expect technology to break the upper bound on intelligence that has held for the last few tens of thousands of years.
In those days [batch processing] programmers never even documented their programs, because it was assumed that nobody else would ever use them. Now, however, time-sharing had made exchanging software trivial: you just stored one copy in the public repository and therby effectively gave it to the world. Immediately people began to document their programs and to think of them as being usable by others. They started to build on each other's work.
In digital era, privacy must be a priority. Is it just me, or is secret blanket surveillance obscenely outrageous?
The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do.
The best technology is when you are free to do what you want.
Skin has become inadequate in interfacing with reality. Technology has become the body's new membrane of existence.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.