As we segregate by income into different communities, schools in lower-income areas have fewer resources than ever.
Robert ReichRead
Can we please agree that in the real world, corporations exist for one purpose and one purpose only - to make as much money as possible, which means cutting costs as much as possible?
Interpretation
The quote emphasizes that the primary goal of corporations is profit maximization, often leading to cost-cutting measures.
In this quote, Robert Reich highlights the fundamental nature of corporations in the real world, suggesting that their main objective is to generate profit. This profit-driven mentality frequently results in cost-reduction strategies that can impact various stakeholders, including employees, consumers, and the environment, thereby questioning the ethical implications of prioritizing profit over broader social responsibilities.
In practice
During a corporate conference discussing business strategies.
As we segregate by income into different communities, schools in lower-income areas have fewer resources than ever.
What are called 'public schools' in many of America's wealthy communities aren't really 'public' at all. In effect, they're private schools, whose tuition is hidden away in the purchase price of upscale homes there, and in the corresponding property taxes.
What someone is paid has little or no relationship to what their work is worth to society.
Tax laws favor capital over labor, giving capital gains a lower rate than ordinary income. The rich get humongous mortgage interest deductions while renters get no deduction at all.
The dirty little secret is that both houses of Congress are irrelevant. ... America's domestic policy is now being run by Alan Greenspan and the Federal Reserve, and America's foreign policy is now being run by the International Monetary Fund [IMF]. ...when the president decides to go to war, he no longer needs a declaration of war from Congress.
You can't inspire people if you are going to be uninspiring.
The real and effectual discipline which is exercised over a workman is that of his customers. It is the fear of losing their employment which restrains his frauds and corrects his negligence.
The most insidious thing about trickle-down economics is not the claim that if the rich get richer, everyone is better off. It is the claim made by those who oppose any increase in the minimum wage that if the poor get richer, that will be bad for the economy. This is nonsense.
If government manages to establish paper tickets or bank credit as money, as equivalent to gold grams or ounces, then the government, as dominant money-supplier, becomes free to create money costlessly and at will. As a result, this 'inflation' of the money supply destroys the value of the dollar or pound, drives up prices, cripples economic calculation, and hobbles and seriously damages the workings of the market economy.
The 'boom-bust' cycle is generated by monetary intervention in the market, specifically bank credit expansion to business.
Prosperous farmers mean more employment, more prosperity for the workers and the business men of every industrial area in the whole country.
In a very weak economy, when you say 'cut government spending,' what you mean is you're laying off school teachers and you're de-funding various programs that put money into the economy. This means you have more unemployed people that then draw unemployment benefits and don't pay taxes.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.