Try any goddam thing you like, no matter how boringly normal or outrageous. If it works, fine. If it doesn't, toss it. Toss it even if you love it.
Research can only present data about the past. No one seriously believes that people's answers to hypothetical questions about the future accurately represent their future behaviour; they merely represent a current attitude, which may or may not be translated into future behaviour.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Research only provides insights into past behavior, and people's future actions cannot be predicted solely based on their current attitudes.
In this quote, Stephen King emphasizes the limitations of research in predicting future behavior. He argues that while data can reveal patterns from the past, responses to hypothetical questions about future actions are merely reflections of present attitudes and do not necessarily correlate with what individuals will actually do later. This insight highlights the complexity of human behavior and the inadequacy of simplistic predictions based on current sentiments.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a discussion about the limitations of surveys in forecasting trends, this quote could illustrate the inherent unpredictability of human behavior.
More from Stephen King
All quotes →Eddie discovered one of his childhood's great truths. Grownups are the real monsters, he thought.
Hairstyles change, and skirt lengths, and slang, but high school administrations? Never.
Description begins in the writer’s imagination, but should finish in the reader’s.
That's the day's business. Thinking. Thinking and isolation, because it doesn't matter if you pass the time of day with someone or not; in the end, you're alone. He seemed to have put in as many miles in his brain as he had with his feet. The thoughts kept coming and there was no way to deny them.
Late last night and the night before, tommyknockers, tommyknockers knocking on my door. I wanna go out, don't know if I can 'cuz I'm so afraid of the tommyknocker man.
Similar quotes
Science proceeds more by what it has learned to ignore than what it takes into account.
A commonsense interpretation of the facts suggests that a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question.
Science has always been my preoccupation and when you think a breakthrough is possible, it is terribly exciting.
What is especially striking and remarkable is that in fundamental physics a beautiful or elegant theory is more likely to be right than a theory that is inelegant.
The motions of the comets are exceedingly regular, and they observe the same laws as the motions of the planets, but they differ from the motions of vortices in every particular and are often contrary to them.
Now we do have many examples of transitional sequences.