When will Labour learn that you cannot build Jerusalem in Brussels.
The role of Ronald Reagan had been deliberately diminished; the role of the Europeans, who, with the exception of Helmet Kohl, were often keen to undermine America when it mattered, had been sanitized; and the role of Mr. Gorbachev, who had failed spectacularly in his declared objective of saving communism and the Soviet Union, had been absurdly misunderstood.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Margaret Thatcher critiques the portrayal of key political figures during the Cold War, emphasizing misinterpretations and diminished roles.
In this quote, Margaret Thatcher highlights how the roles of key political figures like Ronald Reagan, European leaders, and Mikhail Gorbachev were shaped by public and political narratives. She suggests that Reagan's contributions were minimized, the Europeans' intentions were misrepresented, and Gorbachev's failure to uphold communism was underappreciated, which together creates a skewed understanding of historical events during a pivotal moment in global politics.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a lecture on Cold War politics, one could use this quote to illustrate the misconstrued roles of world leaders.
More from Margaret Thatcher
All quotes →Never in the history of human credit has so much been owed.
The battle for women's rights has been largely won.
Ought we not to ask the media to agree among themselves a voluntary code of conduct, under which they would not say or show anything which could assist the terrorists' morale or their cause while the hijack lasted.
Israel must never be expected to jeopardize her security: if she was ever foolish enough to do so, and then suffered for it, the backlash against both honest brokers and Palestinians would be immense - 'land for peace' must also bring peace.
If it's me against 48, I feel sorry for the 48.
Similar quotes
In the hands of politicians grand designs achieve nothing but new forms of the old misery.
We do not deny any nation's legitimate interest in security. But protecting the security of one nation by robbing another of its national independence and national traditions is not legitimate. In the long run, it is not even secure.
One vote. That's a big weapon you have there, Mister. In 1948, just one additional vote in each precinct would have elected Dewey. In 1960, one vote in each precinct in Illinois would have elected Nixon. One vote.
We may be assured by past experience, that such a practice [as some states charging high taxes on goods from other states] would be introduced by future contrivances; and both by that and a common knowledge of human affairs, that it would nourish unceasing animosities, and not improbably terminate in serious interruptions of the public tranquility.
We must abandon the notion that the people govern. Instead, we must adopt the theory that, by their occasional mobilisations as a majority, people support or oppose the individuals who actually govern.
Our American friends offer us money, arms, and advice. We take the money, we take the arms, and we decline the advice.