When will Labour learn that you cannot build Jerusalem in Brussels.
The role of Ronald Reagan had been deliberately diminished; the role of the Europeans, who, with the exception of Helmet Kohl, were often keen to undermine America when it mattered, had been sanitized; and the role of Mr. Gorbachev, who had failed spectacularly in his declared objective of saving communism and the Soviet Union, had been absurdly misunderstood.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Margaret Thatcher critiques the portrayal of key political figures during the Cold War, emphasizing misinterpretations and diminished roles.
In this quote, Margaret Thatcher highlights how the roles of key political figures like Ronald Reagan, European leaders, and Mikhail Gorbachev were shaped by public and political narratives. She suggests that Reagan's contributions were minimized, the Europeans' intentions were misrepresented, and Gorbachev's failure to uphold communism was underappreciated, which together creates a skewed understanding of historical events during a pivotal moment in global politics.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a lecture on Cold War politics, one could use this quote to illustrate the misconstrued roles of world leaders.
More from Margaret Thatcher
All quotes →Never in the history of human credit has so much been owed.
The battle for women's rights has been largely won.
Ought we not to ask the media to agree among themselves a voluntary code of conduct, under which they would not say or show anything which could assist the terrorists' morale or their cause while the hijack lasted.
Israel must never be expected to jeopardize her security: if she was ever foolish enough to do so, and then suffered for it, the backlash against both honest brokers and Palestinians would be immense - 'land for peace' must also bring peace.
If it's me against 48, I feel sorry for the 48.
Similar quotes
The biggest lesson I learned from Vietnam is not to trust [our own] government statements.
Democracy's a very fragile thing. You have to take care of democracy. As soon as you stop being responsible to it and allow it to turn into scare tactics, it's no longer democracy, is it? It's something else. It may be an inch away from totalitarianism.
If you want to preserve - I'm very serious now - if you want to preserve democracy as we know it, you have to have a free and many times adversarial press. And without it, I am afraid that we would lose so much of our individual liberties over time. That's how dictators get started.
I would never want Ukraine to be a piece on the map, on the chessboard of big global players, so that someone could toss us around, use us as cover, as part of some bargain.
The bureaucracy takes itself to be the ultimate purpose of the state
If government were a product, selling it would be illegal.