Science is wonderfully equipped to answer the question 'How?' but it gets terribly confused when you ask the question 'Why?'
Science is now the craft of the manipulation, substitution and deflection of the forces of nature. What I see coming is a gigantic slaughterhouse, an Auschwitz, in which valuable enzymes, hormones, and so on will be extracted instead of gold teeth.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote warns about the exploitation of natural resources through scientific manipulation, drawing a grim analogy to historical atrocities.
Erwin Chargaff's quote reflects a deep concern for the future of science and its potential to manipulate nature for human benefit at a moral cost. By comparing this manipulation to a 'gigantic slaughterhouse,' he emphasizes the ethical implications of extracting valuable substances from living beings, suggesting that, while the scientific advancements might yield benefits, they could also lead to dehumanization and suffering reminiscent of the horrors of the Holocaust.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a debate on environmental ethics, one might use this quote to highlight the dangers of uncontrolled scientific progress.
More from Erwin Chargaff
All quotes →One of the most insidious and nefarious properties of scientific models is their tendency to take over, and sometimes supplant, reality.
You can stop splitting the atom; you can stop visiting the moon; you can stop using aerosols; you may even decide not to kill entire populations by the use of a few bombs. But you cannot recall a new form of life.
Similar quotes
By refocusing our space program on Mars for America's future, we can restore the sense of wonder and adventure in space exploration that we knew in the summer of 1969. We won the moon race; now it's time for us to live and work on Mars, first on its moons and then on its surface.
I think the question is, are there women and have there been women who want to do science and could be doing great science, but they never really got the opportunity?
Every formula which expresses a law of nature is a hymn of praise to God.
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers.
So the thing I realized rather gradually - I must say starting about 20 years ago now that we know about computers and things - there's a possibility of a more general basis for rules to describe nature.
Tell me why the stars do shine, Tell me why the ivy twines, Tell me what makes skies so blue, And I'll tell you why I love you. Nuclear fusion makes stars to shine, Tropisms make the ivy twine, Raleigh scattering make skies so blue, Testicular hormones are why I love you.