Science is wonderfully equipped to answer the question 'How?' but it gets terribly confused when you ask the question 'Why?'
Science is now the craft of the manipulation, substitution and deflection of the forces of nature. What I see coming is a gigantic slaughterhouse, an Auschwitz, in which valuable enzymes, hormones, and so on will be extracted instead of gold teeth.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote warns about the exploitation of natural resources through scientific manipulation, drawing a grim analogy to historical atrocities.
Erwin Chargaff's quote reflects a deep concern for the future of science and its potential to manipulate nature for human benefit at a moral cost. By comparing this manipulation to a 'gigantic slaughterhouse,' he emphasizes the ethical implications of extracting valuable substances from living beings, suggesting that, while the scientific advancements might yield benefits, they could also lead to dehumanization and suffering reminiscent of the horrors of the Holocaust.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a debate on environmental ethics, one might use this quote to highlight the dangers of uncontrolled scientific progress.
More from Erwin Chargaff
All quotes →One of the most insidious and nefarious properties of scientific models is their tendency to take over, and sometimes supplant, reality.
You can stop splitting the atom; you can stop visiting the moon; you can stop using aerosols; you may even decide not to kill entire populations by the use of a few bombs. But you cannot recall a new form of life.
Similar quotes
Our best theories are not only truer than common sense, they make more sense than common sense...
So the thing I realized rather gradually - I must say starting about 20 years ago now that we know about computers and things - there's a possibility of a more general basis for rules to describe nature.
What the scientists have always found by physical experiment was an a priori orderliness of nature, or Universe always operating at an elegance level that made the discovering scientist's working hypotheses seem crude by comparison. The discovered reality made the scientists exploratory work seem relatively disorderly.
Regardless of your sex, if you have elevated testosterone levels in your blood, you're more likely to think a face with a neutral expression is instead looking threatening.
If you get asteroids about a kilometer in size, those are large enough and carry enough energy into our system to disrupt transportation, communication, the food chains, and that can be a really bad day on Earth.
Science fiction [is] the kind of writing that prepares us for the necessary mutations brought about in society from an ever changing technological world and as a result. The mainstream hasn’t excluded SF; the mainstream has excluded itself. No one told Jules Verne he was a science fiction writer, but he invented the 20th century.