The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.
TacitusRead
A shocking crime was committed on the unscrupulous initiative of few individuals, with the blessing of more, and amid the passive acquiescence of all.
Interpretation
The quote highlights how a small group's immoral actions can be supported by the complacency of society.
Tacitus speaks to the moral failings of society, illustrating how a shocking crime can arise not just from the actions of a few bad actors but also from the silent concurrence of many others. It suggests that complicity can manifest not only through direct involvement but also through inaction or passive acceptance, urging society to reflect on its role in the perpetuation of wrongdoing.
In practice
This quote could be used in a discussion or presentation on social responsibility and ethics.
The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.
In private enterprises men may advance or recede, whereas they who aim at empire have no alternative between the highest success and utter downfall.
Great empires are not maintained by timidity.
Things are not to be judged good or bad merely because the public think so.
So obscure are the greatest events, as some take for granted any hearsay, whatever its source, others turn truth into falsehood, and both errors find encouragement with posterity.
The brave and bold persist even against fortune; the timid and cowardly rush to despair though fear alone.
In the final analysis, true justice is not a matter of courts and law books, but of a commitment in each of us to liberty and mutual respect.
More and more of us feel like emergency-room physicians, permanently on call, required to heal ourselves but unable to find the prescription for all the clutter on our desk.
Anyone who thinks that his time is too valuable to spend keeping quiet will eventually have no time for God and his brother, but only for himself and for his own follies.
He that does good to another does good also to himself, not only in the consequence but in the very act. For the consciousness of well-doing is in itself ample reward.
All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others.
The Sophists had this idea: Forget this idea of what's true or notβwhat you want to do is rhetoric; you want to be able to persuade the audience and have the audience think you're smart and cool. And Socrates and Plato, basically their whole idea is, "Bullshit. There is such a thing as truth, and it's not all just how to say what you say so that you get a good job or get laid, or whatever it is people think they want.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.