I always thought I was Jeanne d'Arc and Bonaparte. How little one knows oneself.
Since a politician never believes what he says, he is quite surprised to be taken at his word.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote highlights the disconnect between what politicians say and what they actually believe, often leading to public surprise at their statements being taken seriously.
Charles De Gaulle's quote reflects on the nature of political discourse, where the insincerity of politicians often prevents them from understanding the impact of their words. It suggests an ironic situation in which politicians, accustomed to speaking without conviction, are astonished when the public genuinely interprets their statements as commitments or truths, revealing a fundamental gap in communication between leaders and citizens.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a political debate, this quote can be used to critique the sincerity of the opposing candidate's statements.
More from Charles De Gaulle
All quotes →Don't ask me who's influenced me. A lion is made up of the lambs he's digested, and I've been reading all my life.
Today we are crushed by the sheer weight of the mechanized forces hurled against us, but we can still look to the future in which even greater mechanized forces will bring us victory. Therein lies the destiny of the world.
The perfection preached in the gospels never yet built an empire. Every man of action has a strong dose of egotism, pride, hardness, and cunning.
One must wait until the evening to see how splendid the day was; one cannot judge life until death.
Soyons fermes, purs et fidèles ; au bout de nos peines, il y a la plus grande gloire du monde, celle des hommes qui n'ont pas cédé. [Let us be firm, pure and faithful; at the end of our sorrow, there is the greatest glory of the world, that of the men who did not give in.]
Similar quotes
Political violence is organized violence on the top which creates individual violence at the bottom.
We must have faith, first, that the peasant masses are ready to advance step by step along the road of socialism under the leadership of the Party, and second, that the Party is capable of leading the peasants along this road. These two points are the essence of the matter, the main current.
The Kennedy Administration's public pronouncements on the matter suggested that the presence of Soviet nuclear missiles in Castro's Cuba would represent an unacceptable strategic threat to the United States. . . . This urgent transformation of Cuba into an important strategic base - by the presence of these large, long-range, and clearly offensive weapons of sudden mass-destruction - constitutes an explicit threat to the peace and security of all the Americas. . . .
There may be circumstances in which damaging our relationship with countries over human rights is counterproductive and the benefits to human rights may be very small because of our limited capacity to enforce our stance. That was the dilemma the United States faced after Tiananmen Square.
The two most frightening words in Washington are 'bipartisan consensus.' Bipartisan consensus is when my doctor and my lawyer agree with my wife that I need help.
I recognize the Republican Party as the sheet anchor of the colored man's political hopes and the ark of his safety.