When I hear complaints about less liquidity, remember there is such a thing as too much liquidity.
Paul VolckerRead
It is a sobering fact that the prominence of central banks in this century has coincided with a general tendency towards more inflation, not less. [I]f the overriding objective is price stability, we did better with the nineteenth-century gold standard and passive central banks, with currency boards, or even with 'free banking.' The truly unique power of a central bank, after all, is the power to create money, and ultimately the power to create is the power to destroy.
Interpretation
Central banks, while powerful, have often been associated with rising inflation instead of price stability.
In this quote, Paul Volcker reflects on the historical context of central banking, suggesting that the increase in central banks' influence has paralleled rising inflation rates. He argues that a focus on price stability may have been better achieved in the past under systems like the gold standard, indicating that the ability of central banks to create money can lead to negative consequences, including inflation.
In practice
During a discussion on monetary policy, one might reference this quote to emphasize the risks associated with central bank power.
When I hear complaints about less liquidity, remember there is such a thing as too much liquidity.
The only thing useful banks have invented in 20 years is the ATM.
What's the subject of life - to get rich? All of those fellows out there getting rich could be dancing around the real subject of life.
We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; we know now that it is bad economics. Out of the collapse of a prosperity whose builders boasted their practicality has come the conviction that in the long run economic morality pays.
The world needs banking but it does not need banks.
Markets as well as mobs respond to human emotions; markets as well as mobs can be inflamed to their own destruction.
When people begin anticipating inflation, it doesn't do you any good anymore, because any benefit of inflation comes from the fact that you do better than you thought you were going to do.
What Asia's postwar economic miracle demonstrates is that_x000D_ capitalism is a path toward economic development that is potentially_x000D_ available to all countries. No underdeveloped country in the_x000D_ Third World is disadvantaged simply because it began the growth_x000D_ process later than Europe, nor are the established industrial powers_x000D_ capable of blocking the development of a latecomer, provided_x000D_ that country plays by the rules of economic liberalism.
When inequality gets too extreme, then it becomes useless for growth, and it can even become bad because it tends to lead to high perpetuation of inequality over time and low mobility.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.