The strength of a theory is not what it allows, but what it prohibits; if you can invent an equally persuasive explanation for any outcome, you have zero knowledge.
Eliezer YudkowskyRead
Your strength as a rationalist is your ability to be more confused by fiction than by reality. If you are equally good at explaining any outcome, you have zero knowledge.
Interpretation
Rationalists may find fiction more bewildering than reality, indicating a deep understanding is necessary for insight.
Eliezer Yudkowsky's quote suggests that a true rationalist values clarity and understanding over mere explanation. If one can manipulate any scenario to appear equally valid, it reveals a lack of true comprehension of the underlying principles and truths of reality. The ability to grapple with complex ideas and discern truth from fiction denotes a more sophisticated level of thought.
In practice
During a philosophy lecture, to illustrate the importance of discerning reality from fiction.
The strength of a theory is not what it allows, but what it prohibits; if you can invent an equally persuasive explanation for any outcome, you have zero knowledge.
If our extinction proceeds slowly enough to allow a moment of horrified realization, the doers of the deed will likely be quite taken aback on realizing that they have actually destroyed the world. Therefore I suggest that if the Earth is destroyed, it will probably be by mistake.
In our skulls, we carry around 3 pounds of slimy, wet, greyish tissue, corrugated like crumpled toilet paper. You wouldn't think, to look at the unappetizing lump, that it was some of the most powerful stuff in the known universe.
[...] intelligent people only have a certain amount of time (measured in subjective time spent thinking about religion) to become atheists. After a certain point, if you're smart, have spent time thinking about and defending your religion, and still haven't escaped the grip of Dark Side Epistemology, the inside of your mind ends up as an Escher painting.
The obvious choice isn't always the best choice, but sometimes, by golly, it is. I don't stop looking as soon I find an obvious answer, but if I go on looking, and the obvious-seeming answer still seems obvious, I don't feel guilty about keeping it.
When something is universal enough in our everyday lives, we take it for granted to the point of forgetting it exists.
We are the prisoners of history. Or are we?
All things must come to the soul from its roots, from where it is planted.
Their sighing, canting, grace-proud faces, their three-mile prayers, and half-mile graces.
The one thing that we yearn for in our living days, that makes us sigh and groan and undergo sweet nauseas of all kinds, is the remembrance of some lost bliss that was probably experienced in the womb and can only be reproduced (though we hate to admit it) in death. But who wants to die?
Between two groups of people who want to make inconsistent kinds of worlds, I see no remedy but force.
One of the key places where sociology should be used is in analyzing 'the world' of our times, so that we can be more discerning. To resist the dangers of the world, you have to recognize the distortions and seductions of the world.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.