I realize that having a style would be very beneficial for my practice from a marketing standpoint, but I can't do it. I believe my responsibilities as an architect are to design the most appropriate building for the place. Each place has a distinct culture and function, which for me requires an appropriate answer.
Interpretation
Cesar Pelli emphasizes the importance of context and culture in architectural design over adopting a personal style for marketing purposes.
In this quote, Cesar Pelli argues that while having a recognizable style might help with marketing an architect's work, it is far more crucial to consider the unique characteristics of each location when designing buildings. He suggests that architecture should respond to the specific cultural and functional needs of its environment rather than conforming to a personal aesthetic or trend.
In practice
In a presentation about sustainable architecture, you might quote Pelli to highlight the need for responsiveness to local environments.
Architecture adds dimensions to my life that would be impossible to acquire if I retired. The beautiful thing about architecture is that every project is brand new. I am forced to renew myself with every project. Isn't that wonderful?
I'm particularly interested in the public role that all buildings play. I believe that we architects should try to go beyond our basic obligations to the public, and our opportunities to do so are many.
I'm a bad customer for my own buildings! If I'm choosing an apartment, I choose one about five or six stories high so that I can see the people, the trees, and the world on the street. Beyond that, I lose contact with the ground!
Buildings are 'humane' only when they promote peaceful human co-existence.
The space within becomes the reality of the building.
Contemporary architects tend to impose modernity on something. There is a certain concern for history but it’s not very deep. I understand that time has changed, we have evolved. But I don’t want to forget the beginning. A lasting architecture has to have roots.
Why should we build very large spaces when they are not necessary? We can design halls spanning several kilometres and covering a whole city, but we have to ask, what does it really make? What does society really need?
People can inhabit anything. And they can be miserable in anything and ecstatic in anything. More and more I think that architecture has nothing to do with it. Of course, that's both liberating and alarming.
Architects today tend to depreciate themselves, to regard themselves as no more than just ordinary citizens without the power to reform the future.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.