Terrorism is the war of the poor, and war is the terrorism of the rich.
Interpretation
This quote suggests a deep socioeconomic divide in how conflict is perceived and conducted, highlighting the struggles of the impoverished versus the actions of the wealthy.
Peter Ustinov's quote illustrates the stark contrast between the motivations and consequences of terrorism and war from the perspectives of different social classes. It implies that those who are disenfranchised may resort to terrorism as a desperate means of fighting back, while those with wealth and power engage in war, often impacting the poorer populations disproportionately. This statement captures the cyclical nature of violence and the inequalities perpetuated by economic hardships and the accumulation of wealth.
In practice
In a discussion about the root causes of conflict, one might quote Ustinov to emphasize the socioeconomic factors at play.
Marriage is like a three-speed gearbox - affection, friendship, love. It is not advisable to crash your gears and go right through to love straightaway. You need to ease your way through. The basis of love is respect, and that needs to be learned from affection and friendship.
I'm convinced there's a small room in the attic of the Foreign Office where future diplomats are taught to stammer.
I imagine hell like this: Italian punctuality, German humour and English wine.
Parents are the bones on which children cut their teeth.
Because they have been in love they have survived everything that life could throw at them, even their own failures.
Corruption is nature's way of restoring our faith in democracy.
What is most troubling about Mr. Putin's aggression in Crimea is that it reflects a growing disregard for America's credibility in the world. That has emboldened other aggressive actors - from Chinese nationalists to Al Qaeda terrorists and Iranian theocrats.
With Barack Obama, we will turn the page on the old politics of misrepresentation and distortion. With Barack Obama we will close the book on the old politics of race against race.
We have already given in example one effectual check to the dog of war by transferring the power of letting him loose from the Executive to the Legislative body
Why should Iran have a deterrent strategy? Well, it's surrounded by hostile enemies. Both of its borders have been under occupation by a hostile superpower, the United States, which is constantly violating the U.N. charter by leaving open what they call the saying, 'all options are open' - meaning the threat of war.
I don't think you can understand Trump's relationship to his voters and how he gets away with what he gets away with, without understanding the pact between a lifestyle brand and its consumer base and how that really transformed the global economy in the 1990s.
Those that deem politics beneath their dignity are doomed to be governed by those of lesser talents.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.