It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils.
Niels Henrik AbelRead
Until now the theory of infinite series in general has been very badly grounded. One applies all the operations to infinite series as if they were finite; but is that permissible? I think not. Where is it demonstrated that one obtains the differential of an infinite series by taking the differential of each term? Nothing is easier than to give instances where this is not so.
Interpretation
The quote questions the validity of applying finite operations to infinite series.
Niels Henrik Abel critiques the common practice of treating infinite series as if they follow the same rules as finite ones. He emphasizes the need for rigorous proof and caution in mathematical operations involving infinite series, suggesting that there are scenarios where such assumptions can lead to incorrect conclusions.
In practice
In a mathematics lecture discussing the convergence of series.
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils.
With the exception of the geometrical series, there does not exist in all of mathematics a single infinite series the sum of which has been rigorously determined. In other words, the things which are the most important in mathematics are also those which have the least foundation.
If your payloads cost hundreds of millions of dollars, they actually cost more than the launch. It puts a lot of pressure on the launch vehicle not to change, to be very stable. Reliability becomes much more important than the cost. It's hard to get off of that equilibrium.
It seems sensible to discard all hope of observing hitherto unobservable quantities, such as the position and period of the electron... Instead it seems more reasonable to try to establish a theoretical quantum mechanics, analogous to classical mechanics, but in which only relations between observable quantities occur.
And what I wanted to do was, I wanted to explore problems and areas where we didn't have answers. In fact, where we didn't even know the right questions to ask.
Science can destroy religion by ignoring it as well as by disproving its tenets. No one ever demonstrated, so far as I am aware, the nonexistence of Zeus or Thor, but they have few followers now.
Civilization as it is known today could not have evolved, nor can it survive, without an adequate food supply.
There are no black holes - in the sense of regimes from which light can't escape to infinity. There are however apparent horizons which persist for a period of time.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.