Today, nothing is unusual about a scientific discovery's being followed soon after by a technical application: The discovery of electrons led to electronics; fission led to nuclear energy. But before the 1880's, science played almost no role in the advances of technology. For example, James Watt developed the first efficient steam engine long before science established the equivalence between mechanical heat and energy.
Interpretation
Scientific discoveries often lead to technological advancements, but this wasn't always the case.
Edward Teller emphasizes the historical relationship between scientific discovery and technological application, pointing out that before the 1880s, many technological advancements occurred without the foundation of scientific understanding. He highlights how significant discoveries in science, such as the electron and nuclear fission, have directly contributed to modern technological applications, illustrating the evolving synergy between science and technology over time.
In practice
During a lecture on the history of science, this quote can be used to illustrate how scientific discoveries have transformed technology over time.
In the history of physics, there have been three great revolutions in thought that first seemed absurd yet proved to be true. The first proposed that the earth, instead of being stationary, was moving around at a great and variable speed in a universe that is much bigger than it appears to our immediate perception. That proposal, I believe, was first made by Aristarchos two millenia ago ... Remarkably enough, the name Aristarchos in Greek means best beginning.
The science of today is the technology of tomorrow.
The scientist is not responsible for the laws of nature. It is his job to find out how these laws operate. It is the scientist's job to find the ways in which these laws can serve the human will. However, it is not the scientist's job to determine whether a hydrogen bomb should be constructed, whether it should be used, or how it should be used. This responsibility rests with the American people and with their chosen representatives.
Secrecy, once accepted, becomes an addiction.
No endeavor that is worthwhile is simple in prospect; if it is right, it will be simple in retrospect.
I tried to contribute to the defeat of the Soviets. If I contributed 1%, it is 1% of something enormous.
Information overload refers to the notion that we're trying to take in more than the brain can handle.
My ambition was to bring to bear on medicine a chemical approach. I did that by chemical manipulation of viruses and chemical ways of thinking in biomedical research.
I think the question is, are there women and have there been women who want to do science and could be doing great science, but they never really got the opportunity?
The dangers that face the world can, every one of them, be traced back to science. The salvations that may save the world will, every one of them, be traced back to science.
Mathematics allows for no hypocrisy and no vagueness.
I have also a paper afloat, with an electromagnetic theory of light, which, till I am convinced to the contrary, I hold to be great guns.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.