Dictators fall when they're overconfident; they stay in power when they're paranoid.
Masha GessenRead
When totalitarian regimes are established, they at least have the illusion of the single-minded purpose. But once they establish the stature that's necessary for a totalitarian regime, they tend to flail.
Interpretation
Totalitarian regimes may present a united front initially, but they often struggle to maintain control over time.
This quote by Masha Gessen highlights the fundamental contradictions of totalitarian regimes. While they may initially create an appearance of cohesion and purpose, as these regimes solidify their power, they often face internal strife and chaos. This suggests that authoritarian control can lead to a disconnect between the regime's pretensions of unity and the reality of governance, revealing vulnerabilities that may ultimately lead to their downfall.
In practice
Discussing the nature of governance in a political science class.
Dictators fall when they're overconfident; they stay in power when they're paranoid.
When you lose your freedom, you lose, first and foremost, the opportunity to choose the company you keep.
There's the hypothesis that things just keep happening to Russians, things that keep turning them into the same kind of subjects, as opposed to citizens. The more credible hypothesis, I think, is that there is a kind of trauma, a social trauma that is passed on from generation to generation.
We learn to think of history as something that has already happened, to other people. Our own moment, filled as it is with minutiae destined to be forgotten, always looks smaller in comparison.
Russia, at the start of the 21st century, at least in its larger cities, very much resembled the United States of the early 1990s: being gay was no longer criminal or shameful, but it was still not a topic for polite conversation or public discussion.
... fighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there-because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie. The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change. And again, I don't think it should exist.
But nobody ever forgot anything, not really, though sometimes they pretended, when it suited them. Memories were permanent. Sorrowful ones remained sad even with the passing of time, yet happy ones could never be recreated - not with the same joy. Remembering bred its own peculiar sorrow. It seemed so unfair: that time should render both sadness and happiness into a source of pain.
Accustom yourself not to be disregarding of what someone else has to say: as far as possible enter into the mind of the speaker.
I think vital religion has always suffered when orthodoxy is more regarded than virtue. The scriptures assure me that at the last day we shall not be examined on what we thought but what we did.
World events are the work of individuals whose motives are often frivolous, even casual.
Under our system every voter and officeholder is a man who has demonstrated through voluntary and difficult service that he places the welfare of the group ahead of personal advantage.
Narrative identity takes part in the story's movement, in the dialectic between order and disorder
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.