People who live in poor countries have to be entrepreneurial even just to survive.
Ha-Joon ChangRead
Once you realize that trickle-down economics does not work, you will see the excessive tax cuts for the rick as what they are -- a simple upward redistribution of income, rather than a way to make all of us richer, as we were told.
Interpretation
This quote critiques trickle-down economics, arguing that it leads to wealth accumulation for the rich rather than benefitting everyone.
Ha-Joon Chang's quote emphasizes the flaws in trickle-down economics, which claims that benefits provided to the wealthy will ultimately trickle down to the rest of society. He argues that instead of creating a more equitable wealth distribution, these tax cuts primarily serve to exacerbate income inequality, effectively redistributing wealth upwards rather than enriching the population at large.
In practice
In a discussion on economic policies, one might use this quote to highlight the inefficacy of tax cuts for the wealthy.
People who live in poor countries have to be entrepreneurial even just to survive.
The widely accepted assertion that, only if you let markets be will everyone be paid correctly and thus fairly, according to his worth, is a myth. Only when we part with this myth and grasp the political nature of the market and the collective nature of individual productivity will we be able to build a more just society in which historical legacies and collective actions, and not just individual talents and efforts, are properly taken into account in deciding how to reward people.
Equality of opportunity is meaningless for those who do not have the capabilities to take advantage of it.
The higher education system in these countries (US, Korea etc) has become like a theatre in which some people decided to stand to get a better view, promoting the others behind them to stand. Once enough people stand, everyone has to stand, which means no one is getting a better view, while everyone has become more uncomfortable.
There is no such thing as a free market.
[Good managers] know that people have 'good' sides and 'bad' sides and that the secret of good management is in magnifying the former and toning down the latter.
One way to have broader access to wealth is to reduce the tax on the large group and increase the tax on the very top so concentration of wealth doesn't get to extreme levels.
The basis on which good repute in any highly organized industrial community ultimately rests is pecuniary strength; and the means of showing pecuniary strength, and so of gaining or retaining a good name, are leisure and a conspicuous consumption of goods.
Socialism failed because it couldn't tell the economic truth. Capitalism may fail because it couldn't tell the ecological truth.
That's the problem with very high taxes - they don't redistribute wealth; they redistribute people.
Big companies are reliant on institutional investors on a punishing schedule which leads to ruthless behaviour. This form of capitalism with this structure and incentives will never deliver sustainability.
If government manages to establish paper tickets or bank credit as money, as equivalent to gold grams or ounces, then the government, as dominant money-supplier, becomes free to create money costlessly and at will. As a result, this 'inflation' of the money supply destroys the value of the dollar or pound, drives up prices, cripples economic calculation, and hobbles and seriously damages the workings of the market economy.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.