The law of property determines who owns something, but the market determines how it will be used.
Ronald CoaseRead
During the two centuries since the publication of 'The Wealth of Nations,' the main activity of economists, it seems to me, has been to fill the gaps in Adam Smith's system, to correct his errors and to make his analysis vastly more exact.
Interpretation
Economists have spent centuries refining and correcting Adam Smith's original theories in 'The Wealth of Nations.'
Ronald Coase suggests that the work of economists over the last two hundred years has focused on addressing the shortcomings and inaccuracies in Adam Smith's foundational economic theories presented in 'The Wealth of Nations.' This ongoing effort emphasizes the evolution of economic thought and the continued relevance of Smith's ideas in shaping modern economic analysis.
In practice
In a lecture on the evolution of economic thought, one might use this quote to highlight the ongoing influence of Adam Smith.
The law of property determines who owns something, but the market determines how it will be used.
Roughly speaking, when you are dealing with business firms operating in a competitive system, you can assume that they're going to act rationally. Why? Because someone in a firm who buys things at $10 and sells them for $8.00 isn't going to last very long in that firm.
We must first note that economic factors are taken into account in a world in which ignorance, prejudice, and mental confusion, encouraged rather than dispelled by the political organization, exert a strong influence on policy making.
One of the market's virtues, and the reason it enables so much peaceful interaction and cooperation among such a great variety of peoples, is that it demands of its participants only that they observe a relatively few basic principles, among them honesty, the sanctity of contracts, and respect for private property.
The widely accepted assertion that, only if you let markets be will everyone be paid correctly and thus fairly, according to his worth, is a myth. Only when we part with this myth and grasp the political nature of the market and the collective nature of individual productivity will we be able to build a more just society in which historical legacies and collective actions, and not just individual talents and efforts, are properly taken into account in deciding how to reward people.
All taxes, except a 'lump-sum tax,' introduce distortions in the economy. But no government can impose a lump-sum tax - the same amount for everyone regardless of their income or expenditures - because it would fall heaviest on those with less income, and it would grind the poor, who might be unable to pay it at all.
I will cut taxes - cut taxes - for 95 percent of all working families, because, in an economy like this, the last thing we should do is raise taxes on the middle class.
There is no easy fix or youth unemployment. Partnership between the public and private sectors can make a big difference.
Does inequality in the distribution of income increase or decrease in the course of a country's economic growth?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.