The law of property determines who owns something, but the market determines how it will be used.
Ronald CoaseRead
During the two centuries since the publication of 'The Wealth of Nations,' the main activity of economists, it seems to me, has been to fill the gaps in Adam Smith's system, to correct his errors and to make his analysis vastly more exact.
Interpretation
Economists have spent centuries refining and correcting Adam Smith's original theories in 'The Wealth of Nations.'
Ronald Coase suggests that the work of economists over the last two hundred years has focused on addressing the shortcomings and inaccuracies in Adam Smith's foundational economic theories presented in 'The Wealth of Nations.' This ongoing effort emphasizes the evolution of economic thought and the continued relevance of Smith's ideas in shaping modern economic analysis.
In practice
In a lecture on the evolution of economic thought, one might use this quote to highlight the ongoing influence of Adam Smith.
The law of property determines who owns something, but the market determines how it will be used.
Roughly speaking, when you are dealing with business firms operating in a competitive system, you can assume that they're going to act rationally. Why? Because someone in a firm who buys things at $10 and sells them for $8.00 isn't going to last very long in that firm.
We must first note that economic factors are taken into account in a world in which ignorance, prejudice, and mental confusion, encouraged rather than dispelled by the political organization, exert a strong influence on policy making.
Long-term unemployment can make any worker progressively less employable, even after the economy strengthens.
The great merit of gold is precisely that it is scarce; that its quantity is limited by nature; that it is costly to discover, to mine, and to process; and that it cannot be created by political fiat or caprice.
Thus, our national circulating medium is now at the mercy of loan transactions of banks, which lend, not money, but promises to supply money they do not possess
What I did not know yet about hunger, but would find out over the next twenty-one years, was that brilliant theorists of economics do not find it worthwhile to spend time discussing issues of poverty and hunger. They believe that these will be resolved when general economic prosperity increases. These economists spend all their talents detailing the process of development and prosperity, but rarely reflect on the origin and development of poverty and hunger. A a result, poverty continues.
Let me put it very forcefully: No large economy has ever recovered from an economic downturn through austerity. It's not going to happen in the United States, and it's not going to happen in Europe.
Americans are in a cycle of fear which leads to people not wanting to spend and not wanting to make investments, and that leads to more fear. We'll break out of it. It takes time.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.