To understand the universe in the state that it began in, the so-called Big Bang, we need laws of physics that work better than our current set of rules and procedures, which break down when we try to push them back to the beginning.
Interpretation
We need improved laws of physics to comprehend the origins of the universe beyond our current understanding.
David Gross highlights the limitations of our existing physical laws when applied to the extreme conditions of the Big Bang, suggesting that to truly understand the universe's inception, we require a more refined theoretical framework. This statement emphasizes the ongoing quest in science to develop theories that can explain phenomena at the very beginning of time and the necessity for innovation in scientific thought.
In practice
In a scientific conference discussing the frontiers of physics, this quote can inspire researchers to innovate new theories.
The main reason why people should care about research in fundamental physics is the same reason they care about astronomy and cosmology. People, children, want to know what we're made out of, how it works, and why the universe is the way it is.
In the lab, we could not see or physically describe the mathematical objects that we called quarks, which we suspected were the key to unlocking the dynamics of the strong force that binds together the clump of protons and neutrons at the center of the atom.
You can’t say A is made of B or vice versa. All mass is interaction.
Beyond 2050 the world population may start to decrease if women across the world will have, on average, less than 2 children. But that decrease will be slow.
When I wrote 'Neuromancer', I had a list in my head of all the things the future was assumed to be which it would not be in the book I was about to write. In a sense, I intended 'Neuromancer', among other things, to be a critique of all the aspects of science fiction that no longer satisfied me.
Mathematics compares the most diverse phenomena and discovers the secret analogies that unite them.
Evolution works by selection, not by instruction. There is no final cause, no teleology, no purpose guiding the overall process
I think it inevitably follows, that as new species in the course of time are formed through natural selection, others will become rarer and rarer, and finally extinct. The forms which stand in closest competition with those undergoing modification and improvement will naturally suffer most.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.