Prejudices are what fools use for reason.
VoltaireRead
Whoever serves his country well has no need of ancestors.
Interpretation
Serving one's country is more valuable than relying on one's lineage.
This quote by Voltaire emphasizes the importance of personal contribution to society over heritage or ancestry. It suggests that the actions and service one provides for their country hold more significance and value than the legacy left by previous generations, highlighting a meritocratic view of honor and legacy.
In practice
During a graduation speech to inspire students to serve their nation.
Prejudices are what fools use for reason.
He was a great patriot, a humanitarian, a loyal friend; provided, of course, he really is dead.
It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong.
It is not sufficient to see and to know the beauty of a work. We must feel and be affected by it.
We are all full of weakness and errors; let us mutually pardon each other our follies - it is the first law of nature.
It is better to risk saving a guilty man than to condemn an innocent one.
We prefer war in all cases to tribute under any form and to any people whatever.
There is always a very delicate interplay between individual actions and institutional conditions. But there is no such thing as institutional conditions without any individual actions and no such thing as individual action without institutional conditions. So there is always personal responsibility.
I consider trial by jury as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution.
When the body sinks into death, the essence of man is revealed. Man is a knot, a web, a mesh into which relationships are tied. Only those relationships matter. The body is an old crock that nobody will miss. I have never known a man to think of himself when dying. Never.
Like the practice of breath control, meditation on the forms of God, repetition of mantras, food restrictions, etc., are but aids for rendering the mind quiescent.
People define gay cinema solely by content: if there are gay characters in it, itβs a gay film... Heterosexuality to me is a structure as much as it is a content. It is an imposed structure that goes along with the patriarchal, dominant structure that constrains and defines society. If homosexuality is the opposite or the counter-sexual activity to that, then what kind of a structure would it be?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.