At the heart of liberty is the right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.
Anthony KennedyRead
It used to be widely held that evil was incompatible with the existence of God: that no possible world contained both God and evil. So far as I am able tell, this thesis is no longer defended
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote challenges the idea that God and evil cannot coexist, suggesting a shift in philosophical thought.
Peter Van Inwagen reflects on a significant philosophical debate regarding the compatibility of God and evil. Traditionally, many have argued that the existence of an all-powerful and benevolent God would preclude the existence of evil in the world. However, Van Inwagen indicates that this belief has shifted, as contemporary thought no longer firmly defends this thesis, inviting deeper exploration into the nature of divinity and moral evil.
Themes
GodEvilPhilosophyExistenceCompatibility
In practice
Example use cases
A professor discussing metaphysics may use this quote to illustrate modern philosophical discussions on theodicy.
Similar quotes
The fear of infinity is a form of myopia that destroys the possibility of seeing the actual infinite, even though it in its highest form has created and sustains us, and in its secondary transfinite forms occurs all around us and even inhabits our minds.
Georg CantorRead
I believe that political correctness can be a form of linguistic fascism, and it sends shivers down the spine of my generation who went to war against fascism.
P. D. JamesRead
I never regretted turning down anything, I never regretted losing a job because I always felt something else was out there.
Carol BurnettRead
I know we can't abolish prejudice through laws, but we can set up guidelines for our actions by legislation.
Belva Ann LockwoodRead
What kind of world would we create if three times a day we activated our compassion and reason as we sat down to eat, if we had the moral imagination and the pragmatic will to change our most fundamental act of consumption?
Jonathan Safran FoerRead