Pixar films are not realistic. They are believable for the worlds we are creating.
John LasseterRead
If you're sitting in your minivan, playing your computer animated films for your children in the back seat, is it the animation that's entertaining you as you drive and listen? No, it's the storytelling. That's why we put so much importance on story. No amount of great animation will save a bad story.
Interpretation
The essence of storytelling is more important than the visual elements of animation.
John Lasseter emphasizes the fundamental importance of storytelling in entertainment, particularly in the context of animated films. He suggests that while animation can be visually stunning, it is the story itself that captures and holds the audience's attention, indicating that great animation cannot compensate for a weak narrative. This highlights the significance of a compelling story in engaging and entertaining viewers, especially in family-oriented content.
In practice
This quote can be used in a discussion about the importance of story in filmmaking.
Pixar films are not realistic. They are believable for the worlds we are creating.
Everything I do and everything Pixar does is based on a simple rule: Quality is the best business plan, period.
You know, going to the movies has always been recession-proof. It's fairly cheap entertainment; it's classic escapism.
At Pixar, good ideas may be cut from a film, but they are never forgotten.
Pixar is not about computers, it's about people.
I worry about kids today not having time to build a tree house or ride a bike or go fishing. I worry that life is getting faster and faster.
Once it is out of his hand the artist has no control over the way a viewer will perceive the work. Different people will understand the same thing in a different way.
I hate outlines. I have a broad sense of where the story is going; I know the end, I know the end of the principal characters, and I know the major turning points and events from the books, the climaxes for each book, but I don't necessarily know each twist and turn along the way. That's something I discover in the course of writing and that's what makes writing enjoyable. I think if I outlined comprehensively and stuck to the outline the actual writing would be boring.
I took Punk to be the detonation of some slow-fused projectile buried deep in society's flank a decade earlier, and I took it to be, somehow, a sign.
The idea that one might use art for 'instrumental' reasons tends to set off alarm bells at the heart of the cultural elite, who contend that it's not a pill, that it shouldn't be asked to perform some specific function, especially something as egocentric as to 'cheer you up' or to 'make you a more empathetic person.'
A theatre, a literature, an artistic expression that does not speak for its own time has no relevance.
Writers are opposite of athletes, they get better with age
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.