Is not liberty the destruction of all despotism - including, of course, legal despotism?
Frederic BastiatRead
Topic
60 quotes
Is not liberty the destruction of all despotism - including, of course, legal despotism?
Despotism has so often been established in the name of liberty that experience should warn us to judge parties by their practices rather than their preachings.
Where some people are very wealthy and others have nothing, the result will be either extreme democracy or absolute oligarchy, or despotism will come from either of those excesses.
So long as war is the main business of nations, temporary despotism - despotism during the campaign - is indispensable.
Its authors meant it to be... a stumbling block to those who in after times might seek to turn a free people back into the hateful paths of despotism. They knew the proneness of prosperity to breed tyrants, and they meant when such should re-appear in this fair land and commence their vocation they should find left for them at least one hard nut to crack.
Not mythical material productive forces, but reason and ideas determine the course of human affairs. What is needed to stop the trend toward socialism and despotism is common-sense and moral courage.
Liberty begets anarchy, anarchy leads to despotism, and despotism brings about liberty once again. Millions of human beings have perished without being able to make any of these systems triumph.
Republican despotism is more fertile in acts of tyranny, because everyone has a hand in it.
Our defense is in the preservation of the spirit which prizes liberty as a heritage of all men, in all lands, everywhere. Destroy this spirit and you have planted the seeds of despotism around your own doors.
Government is frequently and aptly classed under two descriptions-a government of force, and a government of laws; the first is the definition of despotism-the last, of liberty.
We are now forming a republican government. Real liberty is never found in despotism or the extremes of democracy, but in moderate governments.
Small natures require despotism to exercise their sinews, as great souls thirst for equality to give play to their heart.
Despotism may govern without faith, but liberty cannot. How is it possible that society should escape destruction if the moral tie is not strengthened in proportion as the political tie is relaxed? And what can be done with a people who are their own masters if they are not submissive to the Deity?
As a nation, we began by declaring that 'all men are created equal.' We now practically read it 'all men are created equal, except negroes.' When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read 'all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and Catholics.' When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretense of loving liberty – to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.
Despotism is a legitimate mode of government in dealing with barbarians, provided the end be their improvement.
Resolved ... that it would be a dangerous delusion were a confidence in the men of our choice to silence our fears for the safety of our rights: that confidence is everywhere the parent of despotism - free government is founded in jealousy, and not in confidence.
Republics decline into democracies and democracies degenerate into despotisms.
Freedom of conscience entails more dangers than authority and despotism.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.