If you just hold your cell phone for 30 seconds and think backwards through its production, you have the entire techno-industrial culture wrapped up there. You can't have that device without everything that goes with it.
Our growing ability to eliminate the slow-moving aspects of entertainment and go hopping from one peak to another is not without cost. Stand-up comics, movie-makers and others who earn their living entertaining no longer "waste" time with setups and plot development, lest we reach for the remote and click them off our screen. The result is a loss of subtlety, anticipation and nuance and, in the process, a coarsening of our discourse.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote highlights how the rapid consumption of entertainment has led to a decline in storytelling quality and depth.
William Raspberry points out that as our ability to access instant entertainment increases, creators feel pressured to forgo the rich elements of storytelling, such as setups and plot development, to keep audiences engaged. This shift results in a superficial experience where the subtleties and nuances essential for deep understanding and appreciation of art and storytelling are lost, ultimately affecting the quality of communication and discourse in society.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a discussion about modern media consumption, this quote illustrates the consequences of quick entertainment.
Similar quotes
It is deeply against my principles to work on any project that I think is to weaponize AI.
It used to be that the only ones with access to cutting-edge technology were top government labs, big companies and the ultra-rich. It was simply too expensive for the rest of us to afford.
You don't get to cut that chain of evidence and start over. You're always going to be pursued by your data shadow, which is forming from thousands and thousands of little leaks and tributaries of information.
I'm not good at selling laptops. I'm good at selling ideas.
People banging away on their smartphones are fluently using a code separate from the one they use in actual writing, but a code it is, to which linguists are currently devoting articles.