I've always argued that this country has benefited immensely from the fact that we draw people from all over the world.
In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote emphasizes that without a reliable monetary standard, such as the gold standard, savings can lose value due to inflation.
Alan Greenspan's quote highlights the vulnerability of savings in an economy where there is no gold standard to anchor the value of currency. It suggests that inflation can erode the real value of savings, leaving individuals without a secure means to preserve their wealth. Without a tangible backing for money, people face the risk of their assets being diminished over time, making it essential to consider alternative methods of safeguarding their finances.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
This quote can be used in a discussion about modern monetary policy in an economic seminar.
More from Alan Greenspan
All quotes βThere's no other job in public life that is like chairman of the Fed.
Since 1948 I have spent every single day thinking how the economic and political worlds have changed.
Most high-income people in our country do not realize that their incomes are being subsidized by their protection from competition from highly skilled people who are prevented from immigrating to the United States. But we need such skills in order to staff our productive economy, so that the standard of living for Americans as a whole can grow.
I don't know where the stock market is going, but I will say this, that if it continues higher, this will do more to stimulate the economy than anything we've been talking about today or anything anybody else was talking about.
Every economy exists, no matter what the level of democracy, has elements of crony capitalism. It's - given human nature and given the democratic structures, which we all, I assume, adhere to, that is an inevitable consequence.
Similar quotes
We've used up a lot of bullets. And we talk about stimulus. But the truth is, we're running a federal deficit that's 9 percent of GDP. That is stimulative as all get out. It's more stimulative than any policy we've followed since World War II.
This long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead. Economists set themselves too easy, too useless a task if in tempestuous seasons they can only tell us that when the storm is long past the ocean is flat again.
No government can give a selective advantage to a specific company, because that would make competition unfair.
We can no longer prosper by increasing human productivity. The more we try to do, the more poverty we will create.
It has often been found that profuse expenditures, heavy taxation, absurd commercial restrictions, corrupt tribunals, disastrous wars, seditions, persecutions, conflagrations, inundation, have not been able to destroy capital so fast as the exertions of private citizens have been able to create it.
That economic decisions are made without certain knowledge of the consequences is pretty self-evident. But, although many economists were aware of this elementary fact, there was no systematic analysis of economic uncertainty until about 1950.