A woman who wants to go places needs to bring her own ladder.
Margrethe VestagerRead
No government can give a selective advantage to a specific company, because that would make competition unfair.
Interpretation
Governments should promote fair competition by not favoring any specific company over others.
This quote highlights the principle of fair competition in a market economy, emphasizing that government intervention should not grant special privileges to specific companies. By ensuring that no single entity receives preferential treatment, the integrity of competition is preserved, benefiting consumers and fostering innovation.
In practice
During a business conference discussing market regulations.
A woman who wants to go places needs to bring her own ladder.
I think any company should compete on the quality of their products, their prices, the novelty they can produce, their services, because that would be fair competition.
When I was very young, I took no interest in party politics. My line of interest was how can you be part of an influence to the society that you live in.
Competition is one of the most important drivers of innovation because you have to stay in the race. You have to think of something new, and if you don't, well, of course you should leave the market.
Technology is, in many respects, an enabler for an open, transparent society. But it's also an enabler for supervision to a completely unforeseen degree. And for commercialising personal space to an unforeseen degree.
We want a free market, but we know that the paradox of a 'free' market is that sometimes you have to intervene. You have to make sure it's not the law of the jungle but the laws of democracy that works.
In a very weak economy, when you say 'cut government spending,' what you mean is you're laying off school teachers and you're de-funding various programs that put money into the economy. This means you have more unemployed people that then draw unemployment benefits and don't pay taxes.
Independent economists say immigration reform will grow our economy and shrink our deficits by almost $1 trillion in the next two decades. And for good reason: when people come here to fulfill their dreams - to study, invent, and contribute to our culture - they make our country a more attractive place for businesses to locate and create jobs for everyone. So let's get immigration reform done this year.
To restore confidence in our markets and our financial institutions so they can fuel continued growth and prosperity, we must address the underlying problem. The federal government must implement a program to remove these illiquid assets that are weighing down our financial institutions and threatening our economy.
Most of the big banks were shot through with short-termism, deceptive practices and self-dealing. We must institute basic changes in corporate governance and in management practice to restore responsibility and honesty for the sake of the economy and for the self-respect of the country.
The culture of self-gratification and deregulation that began during the Clinton years and continued under President George W. Bush led to the bursting of one stock market bubble at the turn of the century and a full-scale financial crash less than a decade later.
Inflation is probably the most important single factor in that vicious circle wherein one kind of government action makes more and more government control necessary. For this reason all those who wish to stop the drift toward increasing government control should concentrate their effort on monetary policy.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.