The King himself should be under no man, but under God and the Law.
Edward CokeRead
The agreement of the parties cannot make that good which the law maketh void.
Interpretation
Laws cannot be overridden by personal agreements if those agreements contradict legal rules.
Edward Coke's quote emphasizes the supremacy of law over personal agreements. It suggests that no matter how much two parties might agree on certain terms, if those terms are in violation of existing law, they hold no legal standing. This highlights the importance of respecting legal frameworks and the limitations they impose on private arrangements.
In practice
Citing this quote in a legal seminar to emphasize contractual obligations.
The King himself should be under no man, but under God and the Law.
For a man's house is his castle, et domus sua cuique tutissimum refugium [and one's home is the safest refuge to everyone].
There be three kinds of unhappie men. 1. Qui scit & non docet, Hee that hath knowledge and teacheth not. 2. Qui docet & non vivit, He that teacheth, and liveth not thereafter. 3. Qui nescit, & non interrogat, He that knoweth not, and doth not enquire to understand.
No man can be a compleat Lawyer by universalitie of knowledge without experience in particular cases, nor by bare experience without universalitie of knowledge; he must be both speculative & active, for the science of the laws, I assure you, must joyne hands with experience.
It is the worst oppression, that is done by colour of justice
So as grave and learned men may doubt, without any imputation to them; for the most learned doubteth most, and the more ignorant for the most part are the more bold and peremptory.
Reaching a conclusion has to start with what the parties are arguing, but examining in all situations carefully the facts as they prove them or not prove them, the record as they create it, and then making a decision that is limited to what the law says on the facts before the judge.
The federal statute is invalid, for no legitimate purpose overcomes the purpose and effect to disparage and injure those whom the state, by its marriage laws, sought to protect in personhood and dignity.
To force a lawyer on a defendant can only lead him to believe that the law contrives against him.
Ignorance of the law excuses no man; not that all men know the law, but because 'tis an excuse every man will plead, and no man can tell how to refute him.
I start out with the assumption that a lawyer in a criminal case is going to be incompetent - substantially so. I find my assumption to be rarely wrong. Yet society starts out with the very opposite assumption.
Commitment to the rule of law provides a basic assurance that people can know what to expect whether what they do is popular or unpopular at the time.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.