The King himself should be under no man, but under God and the Law.
Edward CokeRead
The agreement of the parties cannot make that good which the law maketh void.
Interpretation
Laws cannot be overridden by personal agreements if those agreements contradict legal rules.
Edward Coke's quote emphasizes the supremacy of law over personal agreements. It suggests that no matter how much two parties might agree on certain terms, if those terms are in violation of existing law, they hold no legal standing. This highlights the importance of respecting legal frameworks and the limitations they impose on private arrangements.
In practice
Citing this quote in a legal seminar to emphasize contractual obligations.
The King himself should be under no man, but under God and the Law.
For a man's house is his castle, et domus sua cuique tutissimum refugium [and one's home is the safest refuge to everyone].
There be three kinds of unhappie men. 1. Qui scit & non docet, Hee that hath knowledge and teacheth not. 2. Qui docet & non vivit, He that teacheth, and liveth not thereafter. 3. Qui nescit, & non interrogat, He that knoweth not, and doth not enquire to understand.
No man can be a compleat Lawyer by universalitie of knowledge without experience in particular cases, nor by bare experience without universalitie of knowledge; he must be both speculative & active, for the science of the laws, I assure you, must joyne hands with experience.
It is the worst oppression, that is done by colour of justice
So as grave and learned men may doubt, without any imputation to them; for the most learned doubteth most, and the more ignorant for the most part are the more bold and peremptory.
The constitution is either a superior paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it. It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. This is the very essence of judicial duty.
I start out with the assumption that a lawyer in a criminal case is going to be incompetent - substantially so. I find my assumption to be rarely wrong. Yet society starts out with the very opposite assumption.
The federal statute is invalid, for no legitimate purpose overcomes the purpose and effect to disparage and injure those whom the state, by its marriage laws, sought to protect in personhood and dignity.
The hardest problems of all in law enforcement are those involving a conflict of law and local customs. History has recorded many occasions when the moral sense of a nation produced judicial decisions, such as the 1954 decision in Brown v. Board of Education, which required difficult local adjustments.
I will not say with Lord Hale, that "The Law will admit of no rival" . . . but I will say that it is a jealous mistress, and requires a long and constant courtship. It is not to be won by trifling favors, but by lavish homage.
The language of the law must not be foreign to the ears of those who are to obey it.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.