We pick out a text here and there to make it serve our turn; whereas , if we take it all together, and considered what went before and what followed after, we should find it meant no such thing.
John SeldenRead
Ignorance of the law excuses no man; not that all men know the law, but because 'tis an excuse every man will plead, and no man can tell how to refute him.
Interpretation
Being unaware of the law does not protect someone from its consequences.
John Selden's quote emphasizes that ignorance of the law cannot be used as a valid defense for unlawful actions. It suggests that while not every individual may be familiar with all legal statutes, claiming ignorance is a common defense that cannot easily be countered, highlighting the importance of legal awareness and personal responsibility.
In practice
In a courtroom setting to explain the importance of knowing the law.
We pick out a text here and there to make it serve our turn; whereas , if we take it all together, and considered what went before and what followed after, we should find it meant no such thing.
Of all the actions of a man's life, his marriage does least concern other people, yet of all the actions of our lives, 'tis the most meddled with by other people.
They that govern the most make the least noise.
All things are God's already; we can give him no right, by consecrating any, that he had not before, only we set it apart to his service - just as a gardener brings his master a basket of apricots, and presents them; his lord thanks him, and perhaps gives him something for his pains, and yet the apricots were as much his lord's before as now.
Pleasures are all alike simply considered in themselves: he that hunts, or he that governs the commonwealth, they both please themselves alike, only we commend that, whereby we ourselves receive some benefit.
The 4th Amendment and the personal rights it secures have a long history. At the very core stands the right of a man to retreat into his own home and there be free from unreasonable governmental intrusion.
A person's mere propinquity to others independently suspected of criminal activity does not give rise to probable cause to search that person.
The agreement of the parties cannot make that good which the law maketh void.
Litigation is the pursuit of practical ends, not a game of chess.
Reaching a conclusion has to start with what the parties are arguing, but examining in all situations carefully the facts as they prove them or not prove them, the record as they create it, and then making a decision that is limited to what the law says on the facts before the judge.
The Sixth Amendment secures to persons charged with crime the right to be tried by an impartial jury reflecting a fair cross-section of the community.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.