The thing I'm most interested in is the nervous system. How do brains grow? How do genes build complicated nervous systems?
Sydney BrennerRead
The art of doing science is doing the important things first.
Interpretation
The quote emphasizes prioritizing essential tasks in scientific work.
Sydney Brenner's quote highlights the significance of focusing on the most crucial scientific endeavors before delving into less critical tasks. In the realm of science, where time and resources may be limited, it is vital to identify and tackle the most important experiments or questions first, as these can lead to substantial advancements and breakthroughs.
In practice
In a conference presentation about research methodology, this quote can illustrate the necessity of prioritizing significant research questions.
The thing I'm most interested in is the nervous system. How do brains grow? How do genes build complicated nervous systems?
People have always asked whether evolution is constantly driving onwards and upwards. Is there always going to be improvement? The answer is no: evolution is a progression of form and function, but it is not purposeful.
The moment I saw the model and heard about the complementing base pairs I realized that it was the key to understanding all the problems in biology we had found intractable - it was the birth of molecular biology.
As was predicted at the beginning of the Human Genome Project, getting the sequence will be the easy part as only technical issues are involved. The hard part will be finding out what it means, because this poses intellectual problems of how to understand the participation of the genes in the functions of living cells.
It is now widely realized that nearly all the 'classical' problems of molecular biology have either been solved or will be solved in the next decade. The entry of large numbers of American and other biochemists into the field will ensure that all the chemical details of replication and transcription will be elucidated. Because of this, I have long felt that the future of molecular biology lies in the extension of research to other fields of biology, notably development and the nervous system.
Rising carbon price is essential to 'decarbonize' the economy - to remove the nation towards the era beyond fossil fuels.
Finally we shall place the Sun himself at the center of the Universe.
[About the great synthesis of atomic physics in the 1920s:] It was a heroic time. It was not the doing of any one man; it involved the collaboration of scores of scientists from many different lands. But from the first to last the deeply creative, subtle and critical spirit of Niels Bohr guided, restrained, deepened and finally transmuted the enterprise.
Economists (and others) who are satisfied with nature-free equations develop a dangerous hubris about the potency of our species
The historian of science may be tempted to exclaim that when paradigms change, the world itself changes with them.
The very large brain that humans have, plus the things that go along with it - language, art, science - seemed to have evolved only once. The eye, by contrast, independently evolved 40 times. So, if you were to 'replay' evolution, the eye would almost certainly appear again, whereas the big brain probably wouldn't.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.