The thing I'm most interested in is the nervous system. How do brains grow? How do genes build complicated nervous systems?
Sydney BrennerRead
As was predicted at the beginning of the Human Genome Project, getting the sequence will be the easy part as only technical issues are involved. The hard part will be finding out what it means, because this poses intellectual problems of how to understand the participation of the genes in the functions of living cells.
Interpretation
Sequencing the human genome is relatively simple, but interpreting its significance is complex.
This quote from Sydney Brenner highlights the dichotomy between the technical achievement of sequencing the human genome and the intellectual challenge of understanding the implications of that sequence. While advancements in technology have made it feasible to read genetic codes, deciphering their meanings and roles in biological processes remains a profound scientific challenge that requires deeper insights into genetics and cellular function.
In practice
In a science presentation about the future of genomics.
The thing I'm most interested in is the nervous system. How do brains grow? How do genes build complicated nervous systems?
People have always asked whether evolution is constantly driving onwards and upwards. Is there always going to be improvement? The answer is no: evolution is a progression of form and function, but it is not purposeful.
The moment I saw the model and heard about the complementing base pairs I realized that it was the key to understanding all the problems in biology we had found intractable - it was the birth of molecular biology.
The art of doing science is doing the important things first.
It is now widely realized that nearly all the 'classical' problems of molecular biology have either been solved or will be solved in the next decade. The entry of large numbers of American and other biochemists into the field will ensure that all the chemical details of replication and transcription will be elucidated. Because of this, I have long felt that the future of molecular biology lies in the extension of research to other fields of biology, notably development and the nervous system.
[Bacteria] have an incredibly complicated chemical lexicon that ... allows bacteria to be multicellular. In the spirit of TED they're doing things together because it makes a difference.
Now that we can read and write the genetic code, put it in digital form and translate it back into synthesized life, it will be possible to speed up biological evolution to the pace of social evolution.
What you see is that the most outstanding feature of life's history is a constant domination by bacteria.
Our science fails to recognize those special properties of life that make it fundamental to material reality. This view of the world - biocentrism - revolves around the way a subjective experience, which we call consciousness, relates to a physical process. It is a vast mystery and one that I have pursued my entire life.
Isolated facts and experiments have in themselves no value, however great their number may be. They only become valuable in a theoretical or practical point of view when they make us acquainted with the law of a series of uniformly recurring phenomena, or, it may be, only give a negative result showing an incompleteness in our knowledge of such a law, till then held to be perfect.
As history proves abundantly, mathematical achievement, whatever its intrinsic worth, is the most enduring of all.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.